Evaluation of Propofol in Comparison with Other General Anesthetics for Surgery in Children Younger than 3 Years: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e124
- Author:
Hyunsook HONG
1
;
Seokyung HAHN
;
Yunhee CHOI
;
Myoung Jin JANG
;
Sunhee KIM
;
Ji Hyun LEE
;
Hee Soo KIM
Author Information
1. Division of Medical Statistics, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. hahns@snu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Meta-Analysis
- Keywords:
Propofol;
General Anesthesia;
Infant;
Child;
Systematic Review
- MeSH:
Anesthesia, General;
Anesthetics;
Anesthetics, General;
Apnea;
Child;
Dihydroergotamine;
Heart Rate;
Humans;
Hypotension;
Incidence;
Infant;
Propofol;
Stroke Volume
- From:Journal of Korean Medical Science
2019;34(15):e124-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Despite well-known advantages, propofol remains off-label in many countries for general anesthesia in children under 3 years of age due to insufficient evidence regarding its use in this population. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of propofol compared with other general anesthetics in children under 3 years of age undergoing surgery through a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing randomized clinical trials. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to find all randomized clinical trials comparing propofol with another general anesthetic that included children under 3 years of age. The relative risk or arcsine-transformed risk difference for dichotomous outcomes and the weighted or standardized mean difference for continuous outcomes were estimated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 249 young children from 6 publications were included. The children who received propofol had statistically significantly lower systolic and diastolic blood pressures, but hypotension was not observed in the propofol groups. The heart rate, stroke volume index, and cardiac index were not significantly different between the propofol and control groups. The propofol groups showed slightly shorter recovery times and a lower incidence of emergence agitation than the control groups, while no difference was observed for the incidence of hypotension, desaturation, and apnea. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that propofol use for general anesthesia in young healthy children undergoing surgery does not increase complications and that propofol could be at least comparable to other anesthetic agents.
