Contemporary Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome.
- Author:
Nelson B POWELL
1
Author Information
1. Adjunct Clinical Professor, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stanford University Sleep and Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, USA. nelsonpowell@sbcglobal.
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords:
Obstructive sleep apnea;
Airway reconstruction;
Powell-Riley protocol;
Contemporary surgery
- MeSH:
Airway Obstruction;
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure;
Cooperative Behavior;
Humans;
Palate;
Quality of Life;
Sleep Apnea Syndromes;
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive;
Snoring;
Tongue;
Tracheotomy
- From:Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology
2009;2(3):107-114
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) has been available in some form for greater than three decades. Early management for airway obstruction during sleep relied on tracheotomy which although life saving was not well accepted by patients. In the early eighties two new forms of treatment for OSAS were developed. Surgically a technique described as a uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) was used to treat the retropalatal region for snoring and sleep apnea. Concurrently sleep medicine developed a nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) device to manage nocturnal airway obstruction. Both of these measures were used to expand and stabilize the pharyngeal airway space during sleep. The goal for each technique was to limit or alleviate OSAS. Almost 30 yr later these two treatment modalities continue to be the mainstay of contemporary treatment. As expected, CPAP device technology improved over time along with durable goods. Surgery followed suit and additional techniques were developed to treat soft and bony structures of the entire upper airway (nose, palate and tongue base). This review will only focus on the contemporary surgical methods that have demonstrated relatively consistent positive clinical outcomes. Not all surgical and medical treatment modalities are successful or even partially successful for every patient. Advances in the treatment of OSAS are hindered by the fact that the primary etiology is still unknown. However, both medicine and surgery continue to improve diagnostic and treatment methods. Methods of diagnosis as well as treatment regimens should always include both medical and surgical collaborations so the health and quality of life of our patients can best be served.
