Diversion of the mandibular canal: Is it the best predictor of inferior alveolar nerve damage during mandibular third molar surgery on panoramic radiographs?
10.5624/isd.2019.49.3.213
- Author:
Melek TASSOKER
1
Author Information
1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey. dishekmelek@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Mandibular Nerve;
Tooth, Impacted;
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography;
Radiography, Panoramic
- MeSH:
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography;
Female;
Humans;
Male;
Mandibular Nerve;
Molar, Third;
Radiography, Panoramic;
Retrospective Studies;
Tooth, Impacted
- From:Imaging Science in Dentistry
2019;49(3):213-218
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted mandibular third molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to compare the CBCT findings with signs on panoramic radiographs (PRs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study consisted of 200 mandibular third molars from 200 patients who showed a close relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars on PRs and were referred for a CBCT examination of the position of the mandibular canal. The sample consisted of 124 females and 76 males, with ages ranging from 18 to 47 years (mean, 25.75±6.15 years). PRs were evaluated for interruption of the mandibular canal wall, darkening of the roots, diversion of the mandibular canal, and narrowing of the mandibular canal. Correlations between the PR and CBCT findings were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 146 cases (73%) showed an absence of canal cortication between the mandibular canal and impacted third molar on CBCT images. A statistically significant relationship was found between CBCT and PR findings (P<0.05). The absence of canal cortication on CBCT images was most frequently accompanied by the PR sign of diversion of the mandibular canal (96%) and least frequently by interruption of the mandibular canal wall (65%). CONCLUSION: CBCT examinations are highly recommended when diversion of the mandibular canal is observed on PR images to reduce the risk of mandibular nerve injury, and this sign appears to be more relevant than other PR signs.
