Influence of the anterior arch shape and root position on root angulation in the maxillary esthetic area
10.5624/isd.2019.49.2.123
- Author:
Suweera PETAIBUNLUE
1
;
Pravej SERICHETAPHONGSE
;
Atiphan PIMKHAOKHAM
Author Information
1. Esthetic Restorative and Implant Dentistry Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. atiphan.p@chula.ac.th
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Alveolar Process;
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography;
Tooth Root;
Maxilla
- MeSH:
Alveolar Process;
Classification;
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography;
Linear Models;
Maxilla;
Tooth;
Tooth Root
- From:Imaging Science in Dentistry
2019;49(2):123-130
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to characterize the relationship of the angulation between the tooth root axis and alveolar bone axis with anterior alveolar (AA) arch forms and sagittal root position (SRP) in the anterior esthetic region using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT images that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were categorized using a recent classification of AA arch forms and a SRP classification. Then, the angulation of the root axis and the alveolar bone axis was measured using mid-sagittal CBCT images of each tooth. The relationships of the angulation with each AA arch form and SRP classification were evaluated using 1-way analysis of variance and a linear regression model. RESULTS: Ninety-eight CBCT images were included in this study. SRP had a greater influence than the AA arch form on the angulation of the root axis and the alveolar bone axis (P<0.05). However, the combination of AA arch form and SRP was more predictive of the angulation of the root axis and the alveolar bone axis than either parameter individually. CONCLUSION: The angulation of the root axis and alveolar bone axis demonstrated a relationship with the AA arch form and SRP in teeth in the anterior esthetic region. The influence of SRP was greater, but the combination of both parameters was more predictive of root-to-bone angulation than either parameter individually, implying that clinicians should account for both the AA arch form and SRP when planning implant placement procedures in this region.
