The Equity in Health Care Utilization of One-Person Households: By Comparison with Multi-Person Households
10.4332/KJHPA.2019.29.3.288
- Author:
Bee NA
1
;
Sang Jun EUN
Author Information
1. Health Insurance Review Office, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea. nabeenet@cnuh.co.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Horizontal inequity index;
Health care utilization;
One-person households
- MeSH:
Chronic Disease;
Comorbidity;
Delivery of Health Care;
Diagnostic Self Evaluation;
Education;
Emergencies;
Family Characteristics;
Health Expenditures;
Hospitalization;
Humans;
Insurance, Health;
Korea;
Marital Status;
Outpatients;
Patient Acceptance of Health Care;
Socioeconomic Factors
- From:Health Policy and Management
2019;29(3):288-302
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The one-person households (OPH) are rapidly increasing and vulnerable to socioeconomic and health problems. Because it is predicted to be inequitable to health care utilization, we would like to find out about the equity of health care utilization of the OPH by comparison with the multi-person households (MPH). METHODS: This study followed the theoretical framework of Wagstaff and van Doorslaer (2000), O'Donnell and his colleagues (2008), where the horizontal inequity index is the difference between the concentration indices of actual health care utilization and health care needs. This study employed the 9th Korea Health Panel survey, and a total of 10,807 cases were analyzed. Health care needs were measured by age, sex, subjective health status, chronic disease count, Charlson's Comorbidity Index, limitation of activities, and disability. RESULTS: Compared with the MPH, there were pro-poor inequities in hospitalization, emergency utilization, hospitalization out-of-pocket payments, and pro-rich inequities in outpatient out-of-pocket payments for the OPH. The decomposition of the concentration index revealed that chronic disease count made the largest contribution to socioeconomic inequality in outpatient utilization. Age, health insurance, economic activities, and subjective health status also proved more important contributors to inequality. The variables contributing to the hospitalization and emergency utilization inequity were age, education, Charlson's Comorbidity Index, marital status, and income. CONCLUSION: Because the OPH was more vulnerable to health problems than the MPH and there were pro-poor inequities in medical utilization, hospitalization, and emergency costs, it is necessary to develop a policy that can correct and improve the portion of high contribution to medical utilization of the OPH.
