Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for National Dyslipidemia Screening Program in Korea: Results of Best Case Scenario Analysis Using a Markov Model
10.4332/KJHPA.2019.29.3.357
- Author:
Jae Hyun KIM
1
;
Eun Cheol PARK
;
Tae Hyun KIM
;
Chung Mo NAM
;
Sung Youn CHUN
;
Tae Hoon LEE
;
Sohee PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Health Administration, Dankook University College of Health Science, Cheonan, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Cost;
Dyslipidemia;
Effectiveness;
Screening
- MeSH:
Cholesterol;
Coronary Disease;
Cost-Benefit Analysis;
Decision Trees;
Diagnosis;
Disease Progression;
Dyslipidemias;
Humans;
Korea;
Mass Screening;
Primary Prevention;
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
- From:Health Policy and Management
2019;29(3):357-367
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of 21 different national dyslipidemia screening strategies according to total cholesterol (TC) cutoff and screening interval among 40 years or more for the primary prevention of coronary heart disease over a lifetime in Korea, from a societal perspective. METHODS: A decision tree was used to estimate disease detection with the 21 different screening strategies, while a Markov model was used to model disease progression until death, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs from a Korea societal perspective. RESULTS: The results showed that the strategy with TC 200 mg/dL and 4-year interval cost ￦4,625,446 for 16.65105 QALYs per person and strategy with TC 200 mg/dL and 3-year interval cost ￦4,691,771 for 16.65164 QALYs compared with ￦3,061,371 for 16.59877 QALYs for strategy with no screening. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of strategy with TC 200 mg/dL and 4-year interval versus strategy with no screening was ￦29,916,271/QALY. At a Korea willingness-to-pay threshold of ￦30,500,000/QALY, strategy with TC 200 mg/dL and 4-year interval is cost-effective compared with strategy with no screening. Sensitivity analyses showed that results were robust to reasonable variations in model parameters. CONCLUSION: In this study, revised national dyslipidemia screening strategy with TC 200 mg/dL and 4-year interval could be a cost-effective option. A better understanding of the Korean dyslipidemia population may be necessary to aid in future efforts to improve dyslipidemia diagnosis and management.
