Development and Validation of the Full Version of Story Memory in the Korean-Mini Mental State Examination, 2nd Edition: Expanded Version (K-MMSE-2: EV)
10.12779/dnd.2019.18.3.96
- Author:
Minji SONG
1
;
Sun Hwa LEE
;
Kyung Ho YU
;
Yeonwook KANG
Author Information
1. Department of Psychology, College of Social Sciences, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea. ykang@hallym.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Mini Mental State Examination;
Story Memory;
Immediate Recall;
Delayed Recall;
Recognition;
Mild Cognitive Impairment;
Dementia
- MeSH:
Aged;
Dementia;
Humans;
Memory;
Memory, Short-Term;
Mild Cognitive Impairment;
Seoul;
Verbal Learning
- From:Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders
2019;18(3):96-104
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Korean version of Story Memory (SM) in the Korean-Mini Mental State Examination, 2nd Edition: Expanded Version (K-MMSE-2: EV) was developed. Based on the SM, we additionally developed a full version of SM including delayed recall (DR) and recognition adding to immediate recall (IR). This study aimed to examine the reliabilities and validities of the newly developed SM in the K-MMSE-2: EV and its full version. METHODS: Ninety-five healthy elderly individuals (HE), 90 patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and 53 patients with dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT) participated in the study. They were administered the full version of SM with the Seoul Verbal Learning Test-Elderly's version (SVLT-E) and Rey Complex Figure Test (RCFT). In addition, the SM was re-administered to 51 participants after a 5-week interval. Two clinical neuropsychologists independently rated the performance of 50 participants. RESULTS: The test-retest reliabilities of the IR, DR, and recognition of the SM were statistically significant. The inter-rater reliabilities (Cohen's kappa) were high (0.87–1.00) for all the measures. The IR, DR, and recognition of SM had significant positive correlations with those of the SVLT-E and RCFT. Significant group differences in IR and DR of SM were found among the HE, aMCI, and DAT groups. The recognition scores were significantly different between the aMCI and DAT groups, but not between the HE and aMCI groups. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed full version of SM in the K-MMSE-2: EV was proven to be a reliable and valid memory measure for clinical use.
