Alpha Angle as a Predictor of Impending Contralateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in an Asian Population
10.4055/cios.2019.11.4.466
- Author:
Chloe Xiaoyun CHAN
1
;
Youheng Ou YANG
;
Gloria Hui Min CHENG
;
Sumanth Kumar GERA
;
Ashik bin Zainuddin MOHAMMAD
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore. chloe.chan@mohh.com.sg
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Hip;
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis;
Alpha angle;
Bilateral progression
- MeSH:
Asian Continental Ancestry Group;
Child;
Cohort Studies;
Female;
Follow-Up Studies;
Hip;
Humans;
Logistic Models;
Male;
Multivariate Analysis;
Retrospective Studies;
ROC Curve;
Sample Size;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses
- From:Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
2019;11(4):466-473
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Prophylactic pinning of the uninvolved side after unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is controversial. The alpha angle, a measurement of femoral head-neck aspherity, was proposed as a predictor of progression of contralateral SCFE with a treatment threshold of greater than 50.5°. The aim of this study was to evaluate its validity in our cohort of patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of a 10-year series of patients who presented with unilateral SCFE was conducted. Minimum follow-up duration to identify contralateral progression was 18 months. Age, sex, ethnicity, and endocrinopathies were noted. Alpha angle measurements of the unaffected hip were performed by two independent observers. The average values of measurements were used for analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of contralateral progression. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated. RESULTS: There were 43 patients with unilateral SCFE. Seven patients (16.3%) developed contralateral SCFE. There were 31 males (72.1%) and 12 females (27.9%). The mean duration from index surgery to contralateral fixation was 43.9 weeks (range, 16.2 to 77 weeks). The mean alpha angle was significantly higher in the patients with contralateral progression (mean, 50.7°; standard deviation [SD], 5.4°; range, 43.8° to 58.5°) than in the patients without progression (mean, 43.0°; SD, 4.2°; range, 33.0° to 52.5°; p < 0.001). The alpha angle was also identified as a statistically significant predictor of contralateral progression on multivariate analysis (p = 0.02). The intraclass correlation coefficient for interobserver reliability was moderately strong at 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.55 to 0.87). The area under the ROC curve was 0.88. The treatment threshold of 50.5° had a sensitivity of 0.43, specificity of 0.94, and number needed to treat (NNT) of 2.7. The ideal treatment threshold derived from the ROC curve was 49.0°, which had a sensitivity of 0.71, specificity of 0.89, and an NNT of 1.7. CONCLUSIONS: Alpha angle is a potential predictor of contralateral hip involvement in children with SCFE who may benefit from prophylactic hip fixation. Results from our series suggest a treatment threshold be 49.0°. However, given the limited sample size and moderately strong interobserver reliability, larger studies are needed to validate our findings.
