Quantitation of D-Dimer, Thrombin-Antithrombin III Complex and Prothrombin Fragment 1 2 in Patients with Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation and Venous Thrombosis.
- Author:
Joon NAH
1
;
Chan Jeoung PARK
;
Hyun Sook CHI
Author Information
1. Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
D-Dimer;
Thrombin-antithrombin III complex;
Prothrombin fragment 1 2, DIC;
Venous thrombosis
- MeSH:
Dacarbazine;
Diagnosis;
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation*;
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay;
Humans;
Indicators and Reagents;
Japan;
Plasma;
Prothrombin*;
Pulmonary Embolism;
Venous Thrombosis*
- From:Korean Journal of Clinical Pathology
1998;18(1):35-41
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of the quantitation of D-dimer, thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT) and prothrombin fragment 1 2 (F1 2) in patients with DIC or venous thrombosis. METHODS: The quantitation of D-dimer, TAT and F1 2 by ELISA (Behring, Germany) were done with the specimens from eighty eight patient plasma. The patients were classified as DIC, probable DIC and non-DIC based on the DIC criteria by reserach committee in Japan, and the patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) were included. RESULTS: All eighteen DIC patients showed the increased D-dimer ELISA and fourteen patients showed the increased TAT and F1 2. According to the results of quantitative D-dimer, TAT and F1 2 tests, probable DIC and the group with increased results of above three tests among non-DIC were considered as DIC. Two patients with PE showed increased results of above three tests. Among nine DVT patients, eight patients showed increased results of D-dimer ELISA and F1 2, but TAT was increased in only six patients. Among forty six patients with negative results of D-dimer semiquantitation (latex agglutination), twenty seven patients (59%) revealed increased results of D-dimer quantitation (ELISA). CONCLUSIONS: D-dimer quantitation by ELISA is the most sensitive test in the diagnosis of DIC and venous thrombosis. The quantitation of D-dimer, TAT and F1 2 can increase the diagnostic rate of DIC and venous thrombosis, and the developement of the new quatitating reagents with more rapid and individual procedures will contribute to the accurate and rapid diagnoses of them.
