Evaluation of sperm DNA fragmentation using multiple methods: a comparison of their predictive power for male infertility
10.5653/cerm.2019.46.1.14
- Author:
Aamir JAVED
1
;
Muralidhar Srinivasaih TALKAD
;
Manjula Kannasandra RAMAIAH
Author Information
1. Department of Biotechnology, REVA University, Yelahanka, India. drkrmanjula@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
DNA fragmentation;
Infertility;
Sensitivity and specificity
- MeSH:
Case-Control Studies;
Chromatin;
DNA Fragmentation;
DNA Nucleotidylexotransferase;
DNA;
Humans;
In Situ Nick-End Labeling;
Infertility;
Infertility, Male;
Male;
Male;
Methods;
Reactive Oxygen Species;
Semen;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Spermatozoa
- From:Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine
2019;46(1):14-21
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: The usual seminal profile has been customarily used for diagnosing male infertility based on an examination of semen samples. However, sperm DNA fragmentation has also been causally linked to reproductive failure, suggesting that it should be evaluated as part of male infertility assessments. To compare the ability of the five most widely utilized methodologies of measuring DNA fragmentation to predict male infertility and reactive oxygen species by Oxisperm kit assay. METHODS: In this case-control study, which received ethical committee approval, the participants were divided into fertile and infertile groups (50 patients in each group). RESULTS: The alkaline comet test showed the best ability to predict male infertility, followed by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) assay, the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test, and the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA), while the neutral comet test had no predictive power. For our patient population, the projected cut-off point for the DNA fragmentation index was 22.08% using the TUNEL assay, 19.90% using SCSA, 24.74% using the SCD test, 48.47% using the alkaline comet test, and 36.37% using the neutral comet test. Significant correlations were found between the results of the SCD test and those obtained using SCSA and TUNEL (r =0.70 and r =0.68, respectively; p<0.001), and a statistically significant correlation was also found between the results of SCSA and the TUNEL assay (r =0.77, p<0.001). Likewise, the results of the alkaline comet test showed significant correlations with those of the SCD, SCSA, and TUNEL tests (r =0.59, r =0.57, and r =0.72, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The TUNEL assay, SCSA, SCD, and the alkaline comet test were effective for distinguishing between fertile and infertile patients, and the alkaline comet test was the best predictor of male infertility.
