Comparison Between Endoscopic Prelacrimal Medial Maxillectomy and Caldwell-Luc Approach for Benign Maxillary Sinus Tumors
- Author:
Jung Joo LEE
1
;
Al Magribi AHMAD Z
;
Donghyeok KIM
;
Gwanghui RYU
;
Hyo Yeol KIM
;
Hun Jong DHONG
;
Seung Kyu CHUNG
;
Sang Duk HONG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Prelacrimal Recess Approach; Maxillary Sinus Neoplasms; Caldwell-Luc Approach; Inverted Papilloma; Endoscopy
- MeSH: Ameloblastoma; Cheek; Endoscopy; Fibroma, Ossifying; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypesthesia; Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases; Lip; Maxillary Sinus Neoplasms; Maxillary Sinus; Medical Records; Papilloma, Inverted; Postoperative Complications; Recurrence
- From:Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology 2019;12(3):287-293
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic prelacrimal medial maxillectomy (EPMM) was previously reported to treat maxillary inverted papilloma. This study aimed to compare prelacrimal recess approach with the conventional Caldwell-Luc approach (CLA) to remove benign maxillary sinus tumors and to evaluate the usefulness of this approach based on our experience. METHODS: Ten patients who underwent EPMM at our hospital from January 2013 to December 2017 were reviewed. We also reviewed 30 patients who underwent benign maxillary sinus tumor resection via CLA during the same period. From medical records, postoperative pathological results, complications due to surgery, and recurrence rate were evaluated. RESULTS: There were eight inverted papilloma, one ameloblastoma, and one ossifying fibroma in the EPMM group. In the CLA group, all 30 cases were inverted papilloma. There were no cases of failure at gross total removal during surgery, and no recurrences were observed during follow-up in either groups. Mean follow-up period was 13.0 months in CLA group and 10.8 months in EPMM group. Regarding postoperative complications, 11 patients of the CLA group (37%) and three patients of the EPMM group (30%) had numbness around the cheek and upper lip area after surgery (P=0.715). In the CLA group, there were eight patients who had numbness lasting more than 3 months after surgery, and two patients had numbness for more than 1 year. However, facial numbness disappeared within 3 months in all patients in the EPMM group, in which epiphora was not observed. CONCLUSION: EPMM is the effective surgical approach for resecting benign maxillary sinus tumor compared with CLA. Although facial numbness was reported in EPMM, the duration of numbness was shorter than CLA.
