Long-term Outcomes of One Stage Surgery Using Transanal Colorectal Tube for Acute Colorectal Obstruction of Stage II/III Distal Colon Cancer
- Author:
Yusuke OKUDA
1
;
Tomonori YAMADA
;
Yoshikazu HIRATA
;
Takaya SHIMURA
;
Ryuzo YAMAGUCHI
;
Eiji SAKAMOTO
;
Satoshi SOBUE
;
Takahiro NAKAZAWA
;
Hiromi KATAOKA
;
Takashi JOH
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Acute colorectal obstruction; Bridge to surgery; Colorectal neoplasms; Emergency surgery; Transanal colorectal tube
- MeSH: Asian Continental Ancestry Group; Colon; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Emergencies; Humans; Propensity Score; Retrospective Studies
- From:Cancer Research and Treatment 2019;51(2):474-482
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: Since oncological outcomes of transanal colorectal tube (TCT) placement, an endoscopic treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) with acute colorectal obstruction (ACO), remain unknown, this study analyzed long-term outcomes of TCT placement for stage II/III CRC with ACO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively reviewed from consecutive patients with distal stage II/III CRC who underwent surgery between January 2007 and December 2011 at two Japanese hospitals. One hospital conducted emergency surgery and the other performed TCT placement as the standard treatment for all CRCs with ACO. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to adjust baseline characteristics between two groups. RESULTS: Among 754 patients with distal stage II/III CRC, 680 did not have ACO (non-ACO group) and 74 had ACO (ACO group). The PS matching between both hospitals identified 234 pairs in the non-ACO group and 23 pairs in the ACO group. In the non-ACO group, the surgical quality was equivalent between the two institutions, with no significant differences in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). In the ACO group, the rate of primary resection/anastomosis was higher in the TCT group than in the surgery group (87.0% vs. 26.1%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were noted between the surgery and the TCT groups in OS (5-year OS, 61.9% vs. 51.5%; p=0.490) and DFS (5-year DFS, 45.9% vs. 38.3%; p=0.658). CONCLUSION: TCT placement can achieve similar long-term outcomes to emergency surgery, with a high rate of primary resection/anastomosis for distal stage II/III colon cancer with ACO.
