The Role of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgery in Lateral Recess Stenosis in Elderly Patients
- Author:
Stylianos KAPETANAKIS
1
;
Nikolaos GKANTSINIKOUDIS
;
Tryfon THOMAIDIS
;
Georgios CHARITOUDIS
;
Panagiotis THEODOSIADIS
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Lumbar spine; Lateral recess stenosis; Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery; Percutaneous endoscopic ventral facetectomy; Quality of life
- MeSH: Aged; Anesthesia, General; Clinical Study; Comorbidity; Constriction, Pathologic; Decompression; Diabetes Mellitus; Follow-Up Studies; Health Surveys; Heart Failure; Humans; Leg; Mental Health; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Visual Analog Scale; Weights and Measures
- From:Asian Spine Journal 2019;13(4):638-647
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES) for lateral recess stenosis (LRS)(LRS) in elderly patients and to assess patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: PTES is an increasingly used surgical approach, primarily employed for lumbar disc herniation treatment. However, indications for PTES have been increasing in recent years. PTES has been recommended as a beneficial alternative to open decompression surgery in specific LRS cases; PTES is termed as percutaneous endoscopic ventral facetectomy (PEVF) in such cases. METHODS: In total, 65 elderly patients with LRS were prospectively studied. Patients presented severe comorbidities (coronary insufficiency, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and respiratory failure); thus, general anesthesia administration would potentially cause considerable hazards. All the patients underwent successful PEVF in 2015–2016. The patients were assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks; 3, 6, and 12 months; and 2 years postoperatively. Patients’ objective assessment was conducted according to specific clinical scales; the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was separately used for leg and low-back pain (VAS-LP and VAS-BP, respectively), whereas the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire was used for the HRQoL evaluation. RESULTS: All studied parameters presented maximal improvement at 6 weeks postoperatively, with less enhancement at 3 and 6 months with subsequent stabilization. Statistical significance was found in all follow-up intervals for all parameters (p<0.05). Parameters with maximal absolute amelioration were VAS-LP, bodily pain, and role limitations due to physical health problems. In contrast, VAS-BP, general health, and mental health were comparatively less enhanced. CONCLUSIONS: PEVF was associated with remarkably enhanced HRQoL 2 years postoperatively. PEVF is thus a safe and effective alternative for LRS surgical management in elderly patients with severe comorbidities.
