- Author:
Aliasgar V MOIYADI
1
;
Prakash SHETTY
;
Robin JOHN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Intraoperative ultrasound; Navigated ultrasound; Non-enhancing gliomas; Predictive value
- MeSH: Glioma; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Neoplasm, Residual; Retrospective Studies; Ultrasonography
- From: Ultrasonography 2019;38(2):156-165
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: Non-enhancing diffuse gliomas are a challenging surgical proposition. Delineation of tumor extent on preoperative imaging and intraoperative visualization are often difficult. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all cases of non-enhancing gliomas that were operated on using navigated 3-dimensional ultrasonography (US). tumor delineation (good, moderate, or poor) on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative US was compared. Post-resection US findings with respect to residual tumor status were compared to the postoperative imaging findings. The extent of resection was calculated and recorded. RESULTS: There were 55 gliomas (43 high-grade, 12 low-grade). Forty were close to eloquent areas. The pre-resection concordance of MRI with US was 56%, with US defining more tumors as well-delineated (n=26) than MRI (n=13). US was used for resection control in 50 cases. Gross tumor resection was achieved in 24 cases (51%). US correctly predicted the residual tumor status in 78% of cases. The use of US led to radical resections even in some tumors preoperatively deemed to be unresectable. However, eloquent location was the only independent predictor of the extent of resection. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative US is a useful tool for guiding resection of non-enhancing gliomas. It may be better than MRI for delineating these tumors, and may thereby facilitate improved resection of these otherwise poorly delineated tumors. However, functional boundaries remain the main limiting factor for achieving complete resection of non-enhancing gliomas.