Interobserver agreement in breast ultrasound categorization in the Mammography and Ultrasonography Study for Breast Cancer Screening Effectiveness (MUST-BE) trial: results of a preliminary study
- Author:
Eun Jung CHOI
1
;
Eun Hye LEE
;
You Me KIM
;
Yun Woo CHANG
;
Jin Hwa LEE
;
Young Mi PARK
;
Keum Won KIM
;
Young Joong KIM
;
Jae Kwan JUN
;
Seri HONG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Screening; Neoplasms; Breast neoplasms; Ultrasonography; Interobserver variability
- MeSH: Breast Neoplasms; Breast; Classification; Education; Humans; Korea; Mammography; Mass Screening; Observer Variation; Quality Control; Research Personnel; Ultrasonography
- From: Ultrasonography 2019;38(2):172-180
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to record and evaluate interobserver agreement as quality control for the modified categorization of screening breast ultrasound developed by the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea (ABCS-K) for the Mammography and Ultrasonography Study for Breast Cancer Screening Effectiveness (MUST-BE) trial. METHODS: Eight breast radiologists with 4-16 years of experience participated in 2 rounds of quality control testing for the MUST-BE trial. Two investigators randomly selected 125 and 100 cases of breast lesions with different ratios of malignant and benign lesions. Two versions of the modified categorization were tested. The initially modified classification was developed after the first quality control workshop, and the re-modified classification was developed after the second workshop. The re-modified categorization established by ABCS-K added size criteria and the anterior-posterior ratio compared with the initially modified classification. After a brief lecture on the modified categorization system prior to each quality control test, the eight radiologists independently categorized the lesions using the modified categorization. Interobserver agreement was measured using kappa statistics. RESULTS: The overall kappa values for the modified categorizations indicated moderate to substantial degrees of agreement (initially modified categorization and re-modified categorization: κ=0.52 and κ=0.63, respectively). The kappa values for the subcategories of category 4 were 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24 to 0.52) and 0.39 (95% CI, 0.31 to 0.49), respectively. The overall kappa values for both the initially modified categorization and the re-modified categorization indicated a substantial degree of agreement when dichotomizing the interpretation as benign or suspicious. CONCLUSION: The preliminary results demonstrated acceptable interobserver agreement for the modified categorization.
