Validity of the dietary reference intakes for determining energy requirements in older adults
10.4162/nrp.2019.13.3.256
- Author:
Didace NDAHIMANA
1
;
Na Young GO
;
Kazuko ISHIKAWA-TAKATA
;
Jonghoon PARK
;
Eun Kyung KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Food and Nutrition, Gangneung-Wonju National University, 7 Jukheon-gil, Gangneung 25457, Korea. ekkim@gwnu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Nutritional requirements;
energy metabolism;
elderly
- MeSH:
Adult;
Aged;
Bias (Epidemiology);
Energy Metabolism;
Female;
Humans;
Male;
Methods;
Nutritional Requirements;
Population Groups;
Recommended Dietary Allowances;
Water
- From:Nutrition Research and Practice
2019;13(3):256-262
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the accuracy of the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI) for estimating the energy requirements of older adults, and to develop and validate new equations for predicting the energy requirements of this population group. MATERIALS/METHODS: The study subjects were 25 men and 23 women with a mean age of 72.2 ± 3.9 years and 70.0 ± 3.3 years, and mean BMI of 24.0 ± 2.1 and 23.9 ± 2.7, respectively. The total energy expenditure (TEE) was measured by using the doubly labeled water (DLW) method, and used to validate the DRI predictive equations for estimated energy requirements (EER) and to develop new EER predictive equations. These developed equations were cross-validated by using the leave-one-out technique. RESULTS: In men, the DRI equation had a −7.2% bias and accurately predicted the EER (meaning EER values within ±10% of the measured TEE) for 64% of the subjects, whereas our developed equation had a bias of −0.1% and an accuracy rate of 84%. In women, the bias was −6.6% for the DRI equation and 0.2% for our developed equation, and the accuracy rate was 74% and 83%, respectively. The predicted EER was strongly correlated with the measured TEE, for both the DRI equations and our developed equations (Pearson's r = 0.915 and 0.908, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The DRI equations provided an acceptable prediction of EER in older adults and these study results therefore support the use of these equations in this population group. Our developed equations had a better predictive accuracy than the DRI equations, but more studies need to be performed to assess the performance of these new equations when applied to an independent sample of older adults.
