Technical Performance of Two-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography for Measuring Liver Stiffness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Author:
Dong Wook KIM
1
;
Chong Hyun SUH
;
Kyung Won KIM
;
Junhee PYO
;
Chan PARK
;
Seung Chai JUNG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Meta-Analysis
- Keywords: Elasticity imaging techniques; Liver; Meta-analysis; Ultrasonography
- MeSH: Elasticity Imaging Techniques; Humans; Liver; Methods; Population Characteristics; Ultrasonography; Weights and Measures
- From:Korean Journal of Radiology 2019;20(6):880-893
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the technical performance of two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) for measuring liver stiffness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies reporting the technical performance of 2D-SWE, including concerns with technical failures, unreliable measurements, interobserver reliability, and/or intraobserver reliability, published until June 30, 2018. The pooled proportion of technical failure and unreliable measurements was calculated using meta-analytic pooling via the random-effects model and inverse variance method for calculating weights. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore potential causes of heterogeneity. The pooled intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for interobserver and intraobserver reliability were calculated using the Hedges-Olkin method with Fisher's Z transformation of the correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The search yielded 34 articles. From 20 2D-SWE studies including 6196 patients, the pooled proportion of technical failure was 2.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3–3.9%). The pooled proportion of unreliable measurements from 20 studies including 6961 patients was 7.5% (95% CI, 4.7–11.7%). In the subgroup analyses, studies conducting more than three measurements showed fewer unreliable measurements than did those with three measurements or less, but no intergroup difference was found in technical failure. The pooled ICCs for interobserver reliability (from 10 studies including 517 patients) and intraobserver reliability (from 7 studies including 679 patients) were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82–0.90) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89–0.95), respectively, suggesting good to excellent reliability. CONCLUSION: 2D-SWE shows good technical performance for assessing liver stiffness, with high technical success and reliability. Future studies should establish the quality criteria and optimal number of measurements.
