Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Grazoprevir and Elbasvir for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection
10.24304/kjcp.2017.27.3.150
- Author:
Min Gu KANG
1
;
Min Jung KANG
;
Eunhee JI
;
Bong Kyu YOO
Author Information
1. College of Pharmacy, Gachon University, Incheon 21936, Republic of Korea. byoo@gachon.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Meta-Analysis
- Keywords:
Grazoprevir;
elbasvir;
hepatitis C virus;
sustained virologic response;
adverse events
- MeSH:
Antiviral Agents;
Arm;
Central Nervous System;
Fibrosis;
Genotype;
Hepacivirus;
Hepatitis C;
Hepatitis;
Humans;
Renal Insufficiency;
Ribavirin;
RNA, Viral
- From:Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
2017;27(3):150-160
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: Recently, a fixed combination of grazoprevir and elbasvir (GE) has been introduced to the arsenal of chemotherapeutics to fight against this virus. The study aimed to provide information on the efficacy and safety of GE for the treatment of HCV infection by performing a meta-analysis of literature data. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE database searches were conducted. Among the literature retrieved, pivotal Phase III clinical studies were analyzed. Statistical analysis of the data was performed by RevMan. RESULTS: Four pivotal Phase III clinical studies compared the efficacy and safety of GE. When HCV patients were treated with GE for 12 weeks, the sustained virologic response, defined as the viral RNA level below the lower limit of quantification at 12 weeks after the cessation of therapy (SVR12), was 94.7%. The clinical advantage of GE involves its use by patients with cirrhosis and/or renal failure without dose adjustment. If the genotype (GT) of the causative virus was GT1a with NS5A polymorphism or GT4 with resistance to peginterferon/ribavirin, treatment with GE plus ribavirin for 16 weeks resulted in a better outcome compared to treatment with GE alone for 12 weeks. Adverse events reported during the four clinical studies were 71.09% in the GE arms and it was 76.61% in the non-GE arms, with the most frequent events being mild central nervous system symptoms. CONCLUSION: GE was generally safe and effective for the treatment of HCV infection. However, since HCV mutates very rapidly and becomes resistant to antiviral agents, long-term monitoring should be mandatory.
