Femoral Nerve Block versus Adductor Canal Block for Analgesia after Total Knee Arthroplasty
- Author:
In Jun KOH
1
;
Young Jun CHOI
;
Man Soo KIM
;
Hyun Jung KOH
;
Min Sung KANG
;
Yong IN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords: Knee; Arthroplasty; Pain management; Nerve block; Saphenous nerve; Femoral nerve
- MeSH: Accidental Falls; Analgesia; Arthroplasty; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Early Ambulation; Femoral Nerve; Humans; Knee; Nerve Block; Pain Management; Peripheral Nerves; Postoperative Complications; Quadriceps Muscle; Rehabilitation
- From:The Journal of Korean Knee Society 2017;29(2):87-95
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: Inadequate pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) impedes recovery, increases the risk of postoperative complications, and results in patient dissatisfaction. Although the preemptive use of multimodal measures is currently considered the principle of pain management after TKA, no gold standard pain management protocol has been established. Peripheral nerve blocks have been used as part of a contemporary multimodal approach to pain control after TKA. Femoral nerve block (FNB) has excellent postoperative analgesia and is now a commonly used analgesic modality for TKA pain control. However, FNB leads to quadriceps muscle weakness, which impairs early mobilization and increases the risk of postoperative falls. In this context, emerging evidence suggests that adductor canal block (ACB) facilitates postoperative rehabilitation compared with FNB because it primarily provides a sensory nerve block with sparing of quadriceps strength. However, whether ACB is more appropriate for contemporary pain management after TKA remains controversial. The objective of this study was to review and summarize recent studies regarding practical issues for ACB and comparisons of analgesic efficacy and functional recovery between ACB and FNB in patients who have undergone TKA.
