Evaluation of renal injury caused by acute volume replacement with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 or Ringer's lactate solution in pigs
10.4142/jvs.2018.19.5.608
- Author:
David A FERREIRA
1
;
Rita CRUZ
;
Carlos VENÂNCIO
;
Ana I FAUSTINO-ROCHA
;
Aura SILVA
;
João R MESQUITA
;
Ana L ORTIZ
;
Helena VALA
Author Information
1. Department of Veterinary Medicine, ICAAM Research Center, University of Évora, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
apoptosis;
hemorrhage;
renal injury
- MeSH:
Anesthesia, General;
Anesthesia, Intravenous;
Apoptosis;
Femoral Artery;
Hemorrhage;
Kidney;
Lactic Acid;
Necrosis;
Propofol;
Starch;
Swine
- From:Journal of Veterinary Science
2018;19(5):608-619
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
This work aimed to evaluate the effects on renal tissue integrity after hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 and Ringer's lactate (RL) administration in pigs under general anesthesia after acute bleeding. A total of 30 mL/kg of blood were passively removed from the femoral artery in two groups of Large White pigs, under total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil. After bleeding, Group 1 (n = 11) received RL solution (25 mL/kg) and Group 2 (n = 11) received HES 130/0.4 solution (20 mL/kg). Additionally, Group 3 (n = 6) was not submitted to bleeding or volume replacement. Pigs were euthanized and kidneys were processed for histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses. Minimal to moderate glomerular, tubular, and interstitial changes, as well as papillary necrosis, were observed in all experimental groups. Pre-apoptosis and apoptosis indicators were higher in pigs that received HES 130/0.4, indicating a higher renal insult. Both HES 130/0.4 and RL administration may cause renal injury, although renal injury may be more significant in pigs receiving HES 13/0.4. Results also suggest that total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil may cause renal injury, and this effect can be dose related.
