Changes in the Gastroesophageal Reflux and Esophageal Function after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies in Gallstone Patients.
- Author:
Kyung Sik KIM
1
;
Choong Bai KIM
;
Byong Ro KIM
;
Jin Sub CHOI
;
Woo Jung LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy;
Lower esophageal sphincter;
Gastroesophageal reflux;
DeMeester score;
24-hr esophageal pH monitoring
- MeSH:
Cholecystectomy;
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic*;
Cholecystitis, Acute;
Duodenogastric Reflux;
Endoscopy, Digestive System;
Esophageal pH Monitoring;
Esophageal Sphincter, Lower;
Esophagitis;
Gallstones*;
Gastritis;
Gastroesophageal Reflux*;
Heartburn;
Humans;
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration;
Manometry;
Pathology;
Stomach;
Stomach Ulcer
- From:Journal of the Korean Surgical Society
1998;54(1):91-100
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
It has been reported that dyspeptic symptoms in a minority of the patients who undergo cholecystectomy are persistent. Cholecystectomy may have a direct effect on the development of dyspeptic symptoms, predisposing the patient to increased duodenogastric reflux. Excessive reflux of noxious duodenal content into the stomach has been associated with chronic gastritis, gastric ulceration, and esophagitis. We examined 9 patients with gallstone disease who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy to determine the changes in the gastroesophageal reflux and the esophageal function. All the patients underwent looth standard esophageal manometry to study esophageal function and 24-hr esophageal pH monitoring to ascertain the gastroesophageal reflux the prior to at the time of, and 3 months after the laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The mean lower esophageal sphincter(LES) length, the abdominal esophageal sphincter length, and the resting pressure of LES were increased from 3.1 cm, 2.3 cm 19.9 mmHg to 3.2 cm, 2.6 cm, 22.9 mmHg, with no statistical significance. The mean sphincter function index increased from 1484 to 1888 after the operation with no statistical significance. The mean ampulitude of contraction in the upper, the middle, and the lower portions of the esophageal body, but again increased from 44.4 mmHg, 59.8 mmHg, and 87.5 mmHg to 56.7 mmHg, 84.44 mmHg, and 117.8 mmHg, respectively, after the operation. The mean DeMeester acid reflux score decreased from 13.5 to 7.0 after the operation(p=0.343). In this study, the laparoscopic cholecystectomy did not affect the lower esophageal sphincter function. However there was an increase in the amplitude and the duration of contractions in the esophageal body. Therefore, the heartburn that persists after a cholecystectomy may be an esophageal origin. We suggest that all patients with biliary symptoms, but without documented acute cholecystitis should undergo full upper gastrointestinal investigations with esophagogastroduodenoscopy and pH monitoring (especially dual channel gastric and esophageal pH moniotring) to differentiate the esophageal pathology from other origins.
