Efficacy observation of prosthetic replacement for bone tumors and devitalization and replantation after resection of tumor segment for treatment of extremity osteosarcoma
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-9801.2019.05.009
- VernacularTitle:肿瘤假体置换术与瘤段灭活再植术治疗四肢骨肉瘤效果观察
- Author:
Jie REN
1
;
Zhi LYU
;
Lizhi LI
;
Yi FENG
;
Jia LYU
;
Junjun BAI
Author Information
1. 山西医科大学第二医院骨科
- Keywords:
Osteosarcoma;
Replantation;
Limb-salvage;
Survival rate;
Function
- From:
Cancer Research and Clinic
2019;31(5):327-330
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of prosthetic replacement for bone tumors and devitalization and replantation after resection of tumor segment for the treatment of patients with extremity osteosarcoma. Methods A total of 54 patients with Enneking stage Ⅱ extremity osteosarcoma who underwent limb-salvaging surgery in the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from December 2010 to June 2017 were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed on the prosthetic replacement for bone tumors group and devitalization and replantation after resection of tumor segment group, the 5-year survival rate and distant metastasis rate between the two groups were compared. The χ 2 test and t test were used to compare the local recurrence rate, occurrence of local infection, and postoperative functional recovery between the two groups. Results Forty-six patients were followed up with the period ranging from 3 to 84 months. The prosthetic replacement for bone tumors group had 35 cases and the devitalization and replantation after resection of tumor segment group had 11 cases. The postoperative 5-year survival rate and 5-year distant metastasis rate were compared between the prosthetic replacement for bone tumors group and devitalization and replantation after resection of tumor segment group by using the Kaplan-Meier method (52.5％ vs. 59.4％, 38.5％ vs. 35.7％), and the differences were not statistically significant (χ 2 values were 0.084 and 0.013, both P > 0.05). For local recurrence rate and the risk of postoperative infection, the patients in devitalization and replantation after resection of tumor segment group showed higher results than those in prostheticreplacement for bone tumors group [36.4％ (4/11) vs. 8.6％ (3/35), 36.4％ (4/11) vs. 11.4％ (4/35)], and the differences were statistically significant (χ 2 values were 4.181 and 5.020, both P < 0.05). For 6 months postoperative functional reconstruction score, the patients in devitalization and replantation after resection of tumor segment group showed worse result than that in prosthetic replacement for bone tumors group [(17.4± 2.5) points vs. (24.3±4.8) points], and the difference was statistically significant (t = -4.911, P < 0.05); but this index tended to show better result at 18 months after surgery as compared with prosthetic replacement for bone tumors group [(27.3±2.7) points vs.(24.8±4.6) points], but the difference was not statistically significant (t= 1.811, P > 0.05). Conclusion The efficacy of prosthetic replacement for bone tumors is considered better than that of devitalization and replantation after resection of tumor segment, and it could be used as the preferred surgical option for limb-salvaging treatment in patients with extremity osteosarcoma at present.
