The regulating effect of auricle electrical stimulation on the cardiac vagus nerve in rats
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2019.06.001
- VernacularTitle:电刺激大鼠耳廓对心脏迷走神经的调节作用及其神经机制
- Author:
Haiyuan LU
1
;
Di SU
;
Jie ZHANG
;
Xiaoyuan JIN
;
Yuemei HOU
Author Information
1. 南方医科大学第三临床医学院
- Keywords:
Electrical stimulation;
Auricle;
Vagus nerve;
Heart rate
- From:
Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
2019;41(6):401-406
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the regulating effect of electrically stimulating different parts of the auri-cle on the cardiac vagus nerve in rats, and to explore the basic neural mechanism. Methods The tragus, concha auriculae and helix of 24 male Sprague-Dawley rats were stimulated at different intensities ( 0-16 mA) and with differ-ent durations ( 0-15 min) and any changes in the heart rate were observed. One week later, the rats were randomized into a tragus injection group, a concha auriculae injection group, a helix injection group and a control group, each of 6. The rats of the first three groups were injected with 2 μL of cholera toxin subunit B conjugate AF555 ( CTB-AF555) at the right auricle, while the control group was injected with the same amount of aseptic phosphate-buffered saline at the right tragus. Five days later, all of the rats were sacrificed and their right superior and inferior ganglia and the whole bulbus medullae were resected to observe the fluorescent labeling sites. Results The rats'heart rate declined with longer and more intense stimulation of the tragus or concha auriculae, but not with stimulation of the he-lix. With stimulation of the same duration, a significant decrease was observed in the heart rate when the tragus and concha auriculae were stimulated at 10, 12, 14 or 16 mA compared with when the helix was stimulated at the same intensities. The heart rate when the concha auriculae was stimulated at 12 mA was significantly slower than when the tragus was stimulated at the same intensity. At identical stimulus intensities, the heart rate slowed significantly more when the tragus was stimulated for 6 to 15 minutes and the concha auriculae for 4 to 15 minutes compared with stimu-lating the helix for the same length of time. And compared with stimulating the tragus for 6 to 10 minutes, the heart rate decreased significantly more when the concha auriculae was stimulated for the same length of time. All of the rats in the tragus and concha auriculae injection groups displayed nerve tracer in their superior and inferior ganglia. In the tragus injection group, CTB-AF555 was observed in the nucleus tractus solitarius ( NTS) of 3 of the 6 rats. In the concha auriculae injection group it was observed in 4 of the 6. In the helix injection group, CTB-AF555 was observed in the nucleus of the spinal tract in 5 of the 6 rats, but no nerve tracer was found in their superior or inferior ganglia or in the NTS. Conclusion Electrical stimulation of the tragus and concha auriculae can regulate the functioning of the cardiac vagus nerve, but stimulating the helix cannot. This is partly because the nerve signals in tragus or concha auriculae stimulation and the cardiac sensory nerve signal are integrated in the inferior ganglion and then analyzed and processed in the bulbar center to monitor the heart.
