The Perception for Management of School Foodservice Using of Environmentally Friendly Agricultural Products of Elementary School Children's Mothers in Gunsan.
- Author:
Hye Soon CHANG
1
;
Mi Jung LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Food and Nutrition, Kunsan National University, Gunsan, Korea. hschang@kunsan.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
school foodservice management;
environmentally friendly agricultural products;
children's mother
- MeSH:
Administrative Personnel;
Edible Grain;
Diet;
Eating;
Fruit;
Humans;
Livestock;
Mothers;
Sanitation;
Seasons;
Vegetables
- From:Korean Journal of Community Nutrition
2008;13(6):867-878
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to compare the degree of understanding about school foodservice management and environmentally friendly agricultural products between urban and rural elementary school children's mothers. The subjects were 280 elementary school children's mothers who lived in Gunsan city and the nearby countryside. The results are summarized as follows. The mothers in urban schools were higher on the degree of participation (p < 0.01) and interest (p < 0.01), but were lower on the degree of satisfaction (p < 0.001) for school foodservice than rural ones. The best improvement of school foodservice management was improving food tastes and qualities of the foodstuffs in urban schools and sanitation at the service area in the rural schools (p < 0.001). The school foodservice program contributed to cure the unbalanced diets and developing of bodies and minds; there was no difference of urban and rural schools. But eating habits in rural schools were more improved than urban schools (p < 0.001). The primary reason for using environmentally friendly agricultural products was to improve their health and in securing safe foods, there was no difference of urban and rural schools, but generating the farmer's income from the products in rural schools was higher than urban schools (p < 0.001). There are conflicting views between urban and rural schools for the additional costs brought by using the environmentally friendly agricultural products (p < 0.001). The order of preference on using environmentally friendly agricultural products was rice and various grains, vegetables, fruits, livestock, seasoning, etc. In conclusion, our central and local governments should change their roles in financially positive ways and reflect the issues in making the policy effective. Responsible administrators of school food suppliers run the system more faithfully with the above government support.
