Clinical research of transurethral turning holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2019.07.011
- VernacularTitle:经尿道刀口变向钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效和安全性分析
- Author:
Huilong TANG
1
;
Neng ZHU
;
Li LONG
;
Xiangbin LI
;
Huawei YANG
;
Xiao XIE
Author Information
1. 湖南中医药大学第一附属医院泌尿外科
- Keywords:
Benign prostatic hyperplasia;
Turning holmium laser;
Enucleation of the prostate
- From:
Chinese Journal of Urology
2019;40(7):531-536
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of turning holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (THoLEP) and transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).Methods A retrospective analysis of 532 patients with BPH surgery from January 2016 to December 2017 was performed,including 289 cases of transurethral resection of holmium laser enucleation (THoLEP) and 43 cases of transurethral holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP).Cases with incomplete data were excluded.Finally,100 patients were enrolled and divided into THoLEP group and HoLEP.The mean ages of patients in the THoLEP group and the HoLEP group were (74.6 ± 8.2) years and (75.3 ± 7.7) years,respectively.The prostate weights were (52.3 ± 23.1) g and (52.6 ± 22.7) g,respectively.International prostate symptom scores (IPSS) were (22.8 ± 1.3) and (23.1 ± 1.6),and the quality of life score (QOL) scores were (4.4 ± 0.5) and (4.3 ± 0.8),respectively.The rate of mximum flow rate (Qmax) was (5.9 ± 2.7) ml/s and (6.3 ± 2.8) mL/s,respectively.The residual urine volume was (149.3 ± 8.7) ml and (145.3 ± 9.7) ml,respectively.There was no significant difference between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05).Results Compared with HoLEP group,THoLEP group showed shorter operation time [(44 ± 13) min vs.(61 ± 15) min,P ＜ 0.05] and less intraoperative bleeding [(101.6 ± 13.2) ml vs.(119.9 ± 18.0) ml,P ＜ 0.05].The weight of the resected tissue in the THoLEP group was slightly larger than that in the HoLEP group,however the difference was not statistically significant [(30.5 ± 9.5) g vs.(28.7 ± 8.5) g] (P ＞ 0.05).The incidence of transient urinary incontinence in THoLEP group was less than that in HoLEP group [2 and 4 cases,P ＜ 0.05].There were no cases of urinary incontinence in both groups after 3 months,and no permanent urinary incontinence in both groups.THoLEP was slightly better than HoLEP group,but the difference was not statistically significant (P ＞0.05).Conclusions Compared with HoLEP,THoLEP has similar short-term results,and has more advantages in shortening the operation time,reducing intraoperative bleeding and transient urinary incontinence.It is a safer and effective method for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
