Nonenhanced electrocardiogram?gated quiescent?interval single?shot MR angiography of the lower extremities:comparison with CT angiography
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005?1201.2019.06.007
- VernacularTitle:心电门控非对比增强静息间隔单次激发MR血管成像在下肢动脉狭窄中的应用价值
- Author:
Ming YANG
1
;
Wenliang FAN
;
Jianming YU
;
Ziqiao LEI
;
Zhuang NIE
;
Qian LI
;
Lan CHENG
;
Bin CHI
Author Information
1. 华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院放射科分子影像湖北省重点实验室
- Keywords:
Lower extremity peripheral artery;
Magnetic resonance imaging;
Tomography,X?ray computed
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiology
2019;53(6):475-479
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the diagnose value of nonenhanced electrocardiogram (ECG)?gated quiescent?interval single?shot MR angiography (QISS MRA) in lower extremity arterial stenosis. Methods A retrospective analysis of 30 patients with lower extremity ischemic manifestations and concurrent lower extremity arterial CTA and QISS MRA was performed from April to December 2017 at the Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. All patients underwent CTA and ECG?gated non?contrast?enhanced QISS MRA. The entire lower extremity arteries were divided into 19 segments (lower abdominal aorta, common iliac artery, internal iliac artery, external iliac artery, superficial femoral artery, deep femoral artery, radial artery, anterior tibialis anterior tibial artery, posterior tibial artery, radial artery). Two radiologists scored QISS MRA and CTA image quality using a 4?point scale and assessed the severity of arterial stenosis. Kappa analysis was used to evaluate the degree of stenosis of different examination methods in the same patient and the consistency of the scores of different radiologsts in the same patient. Result A total of 570 vessel segments were collected from 30 patients. The image quality of 560/570 (98.2%) and 548/570 (96.1%) of radiologist 1 was rated as excellent or good by CTA and QISS?MRA (grades 3 and 4), and 561/570 (98.4% of radiologist 2) The image quality of the segment and the 544/570 (95.4%) segment were rated as excellent or good by CTA and QISS?MRA, respectively. The image quality scores of radiologist 1 to CTA and QISS MRA were (3.87±0.38) and (3.70± 0.53), respectively, and radiologist 2 were (3.86±0.40) and (3.68±0.54) respectively. On the QISS?MRA, only 7 of the 570 segments (1.2%, 7/570) obtained images that could not satisfy the diagnostic image quality. The two radiologists used CTA and QISS MRA to evaluate the consistency of different degrees of vascular stenosis. The radiologist 1 evaluated the Kappa value of CTA and QISS MRA between 0.714 and 0.939 for different degrees of vascular stenosis. Radiologist 2 had a Kappa value of 0.603 to 0.939. QISS MRA was used to evaluate the consistency of vascular stenosis in different segments between the two radiologists. The Kappa value ranged from 0.813 to 0.933. Conclusion QISS?MRA is of great value in the diagnosis of lower extremity arterial stenosis.
