Survey of the acceptance status of HPV self-sampling screening in female population for cervical cancer
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.05.005
- VernacularTitle:自取样HPV检测技术在子宫颈癌筛查人群中的接受状况调查
- Author:
Yun ZHAO
1
;
Qi LIAO
;
Xin MI
;
Mingzhu LI
;
Chao ZHAO
;
Shuhui CUI
;
Jingran LI
;
Yue WANG
;
Jianliu WANG
;
Lihui WEI
Author Information
1. 北京大学人民医院妇产科100044
- Keywords:
Papillomaviridae;
Self-examination;
Specimen handling;
Early detection of cancer;
Uterine cervical neoplasms
- From:
Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2019;54(5):312-317
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the acceptance of HPV self-sampling mode in cervical cancer screening population and explore its feasibility. Methods From March 5 to 15, 2018, researchers investigated women who participated in cervical cancer screening organized by Beijing Shunyi Women＇s and Children＇s Hospital in the form of questionnaires. Questionnaires were conducted on their acceptance status and the factors that affect the self-sampling experience. The specific contents of the questionnaires were as follows: (1) the experience of using self-sampling included operability, comfortable, sample time-consuming, bleeding or not after sampling; (2) psychological changes after self-sampling, including the willingness to accept self-sampling again, the worrying problems during self-sampling process. According to whether or not have operating video guidance, the self-sampling experience and psychological changes after self-sampling were compared. Results (1) There were 1 375 women participated in the questionnaire survey, and 86.55% (1 190/1 375) of them thought the self-sampling was convenient, 78.40% (1 078/1 375) thought it was not uncomfortable, 88.58% (1 218/1 375) thought the sampling time was fast (less than 5 minutes), 94.04% (1 293/1 375) self-sampling without bleeding; and 83.27% (1 145/1 375) were willing to self-sampling for cervical cancer screening again, 85.82% (1 180/1 375) were afraid of inaccurate sampling. (2) Among the 1 375 women, 1 202 were in the video guidance group and 173 were in the non-guidance group. The self-sampling experience of women in video guidance group was better than those of non-guidance group in operability, comfortable, sampling time-consuming and bleeding after sampling. The proportion of women who willing to self-sampling again was higher than that of non-guidance group (86.69% vs 59.54%, respectively). The proportion of women who worried operating incorrectly was lower than that of non-guidance group (11.23% vs 32.37%, respectively). The differences were significant (all P<0.05). Conclusions Self-sampling for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening is easy to operate and has little discomfort complaint. It is feasible in cervical cancer screening. Operational video guidance during the screening process could effectively improve the women＇s experience and willingness to self-sampling again in the future.
