Application of vacuum sealing drainage in limb salvage of multiple trauma patients with Gustilo type Ⅲ C open fracture
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2019.07.012
- VernacularTitle:负压封闭引流技术在多发伤合并Gustilo Ⅲ C型开放性骨折患者保肢治疗中的应用
- Author:
Xiang WANG
1
;
Fan YANG
;
Jie XIE
;
Jiajun CHEN
;
Xianzhou SONG
;
Xiangjun BAI
Author Information
1. 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院创伤中心/急诊创伤外科
- Keywords:
Multiple trauma;
Negative-pressure wound therapy;
Fractures,open;
Prognosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Trauma
2019;35(7):647-652
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the safety and effectiveness of vacuum sealing drainage treatment on limb salvage in multiple trauma patients combined with Gustilo type ⅢC fracture.Methods A retrospective case control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 102 patients diagnosed with multiple trauma combined with Gustilo type Ⅲ C fracture admitted to Tongji Hospital from October 2005 to October 2015.There were 66 males and 36 temales,aged 17-65 years [(34.2 10.1) years].The injury severity score (ISS) ranged from 18 to 26 points [(19.8 ± 3.2)points].There were 34 patients with femur fracture,66 with tibia/fibula fracture,35 with femur and tibia/fibula fracture.Among the patients,58 were treated with VSD (VSD group) and 44 were treated with routine dressing change after emergency operation (routine group).The two groups were compared for active bleeding,re-vascular exploration,osteofascial compartment syndrome,wound infection and necrosis,gas gangrene,delayed amputation,systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS),sepsis,deep venous thrombosis (DVT)incidence,per capita debridement times,length of stay,skin graft/skin flap rate,fracture fixation rate,incidence of refractory wounds,incidence of nonunion,incidence of complete nerve damage,British medical research council (BMRC) score,and amputation rate/salvage rate.Results All patients were followed up for 6-14 months [(8.4.2.1) months].There was no significant difference in limb salvage rate between the two groups after operation (P ＞ 0.05).Among the indexes of limb salvage treatment after operation,no significant differences were found between the routine group and VSD group in active bleeding,gas gangrene,re-vascular exploration and delayed amputation (P ＞ 0.05);the wound infection and necrosis rates were 32％ and 15％ (P ＜ 0.05);the incidence rates of osteofascial compartment syndrome were 22％ and 7％ (P ＜ 0.05).During the hospital stay,there were no significant differences in DVT incidence and fracture internal fixation rate between the two groups;SIRS incidence rates of routine group and VSD group were 92％ and 73％ (P ＜0.05);the incidence rates of sepsis were 28％ and 10％ (P ＜ 0.05);the per capita debridement times in routine group and VSD group were 4.2 times and 3.2 times,respectively (P ＜ 0.05);hospitalization durations were 42.1 days and 30.2 days (P ＜0.05);skin graft/skin flap rates were 69％ and 46％ (P ＜ 0.05).In the follow-up results,there was no significant difference in the amputation rate/salvage rate between the two groups (P ＜ 0.05).The incidence of refractory wounds was 28％ in routine group and 10％ in VSD group (P ＜ 0.05);the incidence of nonunion was 22％ and 6％ (P ＜ 0.05);the incidence of complete neurological damage was 36％ and 12％ (P ＜ 0.05);the excellent and good rate of BMRC score was 83％ and 96％ (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions VSD technology can promote wound healing after operation,prevent complications,reduce the number of debridement operations and shorten hospital stay,significantly improving the prognosis and limb function of patients.It is a relatively safe and effective method for the treatment of multiple trauma combined with Gustilo type Ⅲ C fracture.
