Clinical analysis of 137 cases of cardiac arrest treated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation machine
10.3969/j.issn.1008-9691.2019.04.011
- VernacularTitle:应用心肺复苏机抢救137例心搏骤停患者的临床分析
- Author:
Yihong YANG
1
;
Jin YAN
;
Yecheng LIU
Author Information
1. 阜阳市人民医院急诊科
- Keywords:
Cardiac arrest;
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation machine;
Unarmed cardiopulmonary resuscitation;
Autonomic cycle recovery;
Time of rescue
- From:
Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Intensive and Critical Care
2019;26(4):423-425
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To observe the clinical effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the treatment of cardiac arrest. Methods A retrospective analysis was coducted, 137 patients with cardiac arrest admitted to Department of Emergency of Fuyang People's Hospital from January 2017 to December 2018 were enrolled, emergency rescue with CPR machine. There were 116 cases of CPR in emergency room, including 44 cases of cardiac arrest before hospital and 72 cases of cardiac arrest in hospital. There were CPR was 21 cases of CPR in EICU. The difference of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate and rescue time between Emergency Room and Emergency Intensive Care Unit (EICU) and ROSC rate in patients with cardiac arrest before and after emergency rescue room were compared. Results There were 45 cases of ROSC in 137 patients, the success rate of rescue was 32.85%, rescue time was 30.00 (20.00-40.00) minutes, and the maximum duration of times was 180 minutes. The ROSC rate of EICU was significantly higher than that of emergency room [66.67% (14/21) vs. 26.72% (31/116), P < 0.05], and the rescue time was significantly shorter than that of emergency room [minutes: 25.00 (10.00-30.00) vs. 30.00 (25.00-40.00), P < 0.05]. The ROSC rate of patients with cardiac arrest in emergency room was significantly higher than that before hospitalization [33.33% (24/72) vs. 15.91% (7/44), P < 0.05], there was no significant difference in rescue time between patients with cardiac arrest in emergency room and that before hospitalization [minutes: 30.00 (20.00-40.00) vs. 30.00 (26.25-40.00), P > 0.05]. Conclusions The function of CPR provides high quality extrathoracic compression, which effectively saves the labor cost of cardiac compression, especially in the case of shortage of medical and nursing staff. In the face of patients who need continuous CPR for a long time, it is a feasible choice to use CPR machine instead of unarmed CPR, which is worth popularizing in clinic.
