Effect of nursing mode based on Omaha framework on nutrition intervention of low-weight patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
10.3969/j.issn.1008-9691.2019.01.022
- VernacularTitle:基于奥马哈系统护理模式对低体质量慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者营养状况的影响
- Author:
Xiaoyue ZOU
1
;
Hui HAN
;
Lijuan SHEN
;
Jing SANG
Author Information
1. 湖州市第一人民医院
- Keywords:
Omaha system;
Low body weight;
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;
Nursing intervention;
Mini Nutritional Assessment
- From:
Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Intensive and Critical Care
2019;26(1):79-82
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the effect of Omaha system nursing model on nutritional status and disease condition of patients with low body mass and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Sixty COPD patients with low body mass who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University from January 2015 to November 2016 were enrolled, and they were randomly divided into an Omaha system nursing model group and a routine care intervention group, with 30 cases in each group. The Delphi expert consultation method was used to construct the Omaha nursing problem system and intervention system for COPD patients with low body mass. The patients in the routine care intervention group were given routine care intervention; the patients in the Omaha system nursing model group underwent nutritional intervention according to the Omaha system nursing model. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC) were used to be the evaluation system of the Omaha system nursing model, the changes of MNA, CAT and mMRC evaluation scores on admission and in 1, 3, and 6 months after discharge in the two groups were recorded, and the correlations between MNA score and CAT, mMRC scores were analyzed. Results Omaha system analysis showed that the main health problems of the Omaha system nursing model group were distributed in the environmental (17.86%), social psychological (8.93%), physiological (19.64%), and health-related behavioral (53.57%) aspects, among which health-related behaviors were mostly common. There were no statistical significant differences in the scores of CAT, mMRC, and MNA between the two groups on admission (all P > 0.05). The CAT and mMRC scores of the Omaha system nursing model group in 1, 3, and 6 months after discharge were significantly lower than those on admission (CAT score: 16.98±2.39, 16.67±2.55, 15.36±2.17 vs. 25.76±3.67; mMRC score: 2.35±0.57, 1.97±0.52, 1.49±0.51 vs. 3.07±0.55, all P < 0.05), MNA scores were significantly higher than those on admission (11.89±3.57, 13.97±3.52, 15.49±3.51 vs. 10.33±3.02, all P < 0.05), and along with the prolongation of time the decrease and increase in scores were more significant. The scores of the Omaha system nursing model group were improved more significantly in 1, 3 and 6 months after discharge than those of the routine care intervention group (CAT score: 16.98±2.39, 16.67±2.55, 15.36±2.17 vs. 23.01±2.67, 21.15±2.79, 19.06±2.61; mMRC score: 2.35±0.57, 1.97±0.52, 1.49±0.51 vs. 3.06±0.65, 3.06±0.61, 2.65±0.67;MNA score: 11.89±3.57, 13.97±3.52, 15.49±3.51 vs. 9.96±3.15, 10.06±3.09, 8.55±3.17, all P < 0.05]. Pearson correlation analyses showed that MNA score was significantly negatively correlated with CAT score (r = -0.493, P = 0.001) and with mMRC score (r = -0.594, P = 0.001) respectively. Conclusion Using the Omaha system nursing model for nutrition intervention in COPD patients with low body mass can significantly improve their nutritional status and disease condition as well as quality of life.
