Comparison of the efficacy and safety of cisplatin, etoposide, and irinotecan combined with chemotherapy and topotecan monotherapy as second-line treatment for patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC
10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2019.03.283
- VernacularTitle:三药联合化疗和单药拓扑替康二线治疗小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性比较
- Author:
Liang ZHANG
1
;
Xianhong LIU
;
Ying LIU
;
Lianwei BAI
;
Ying CHENG
Author Information
1. 吉林省肿瘤医院胸部肿瘤内科(长春市130012)
- Keywords:
small cell lung cancer (SCLC);
sensitive relapsed;
second-line treatment;
combined chemotherapy;
topotecan
- From:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
2019;46(3):133-137
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To investigate whether combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide, and irinotecan was better than topotecan alone as second-line chemotherapy in patients with sensitive relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Method: Between September, 2014 and September, 2017, the patients'data were collected in Jilin Province Cancer Hospital. All patients were diagnosed with sensitive relapsed SCLC. Thirty-six patients received combination chemotherapy containing cisplatin plus etoposide plus irinotecan, and 42 patients received topotecan alone. Combination chemotherapy consisted of five 2-week courses of intravenous cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, intravenous etoposide 60 mg/m2 on days 1-3, and intravenous irinotecan 90 mg/m2 on day 8. Topotecan therapy consisted of at least one course of intravenous topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 on days 1-5, every 3 weeks. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of drugs. Results: PFS was significantly longer in the combination chemotherapy group [median 5.3 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3-5.8] than in the topotecan group (3.2 months, 95% CI: 2.7-4.0;P=0.0030); OS was also significantly increased in the combination chemotherapy group (median 16.3 months, 95% CI: 13.8-19.1) than in the topotecan group (13.1 months, 95% CI: 10.2-15.4; P=0.0097). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia [31 (86.1%) patients in the combination chemotherapy group vs. 28 (66.7%) patients in the topotecan group], anemia [26 (72.2%) vs. 10 (23.8%)], leucopenia [29 (80.6%) vs . 21 (50.0%)], and thrombocytopenia [13 (36.1%) vs . 11 (26.2%)]. One treatment-related death (febrile neutropenia with pulmonary infection) occurred in the combination chemotherapy group, and none occurred in the topotecan group. Conclusions:Combination chemotherapy with cisplatin plus etoposide plus irinotecan could be considered a treatment option in second-line che-motherapy for selected patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC. However, the combination chemotherapy group had a higher incidence of adverse events than the topotecan group, and appropriate drug dosages should be explored.
