Antibiotic Spacers in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Comparison of Stemmed and Stemless Implants.
10.4055/cios.2017.9.4.489
- Author:
Eric M PADEGIMAS
1
;
Alexia NARZIKUL
;
Cassandra LAWRENCE
;
Benjamin A HENDY
;
Joseph A ABBOUD
;
Matthew L RAMSEY
;
Gerald R WILLIAMS
;
Surena NAMDARI
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Shoulder;
Arthroplasty;
Replacement;
Prosthesis-related infections;
Arthritis infectious
- MeSH:
Anti-Bacterial Agents;
Arthroplasty*;
Body Mass Index;
Comorbidity;
Dislocations;
Humans;
Joints;
Male;
Operative Time;
Paralysis;
Prosthesis-Related Infections;
Radial Nerve;
Range of Motion, Articular;
Replantation;
Shoulder*
- From:Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
2017;9(4):489-496
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic spacers in shoulder periprosthetic joint infection deliver antibiotics locally and provide temporary stability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences between stemmed and stemless spacers. METHODS: All spacers placed from 2011 to 2013 were identified. Stemless spacers were made by creating a spherical ball of cement placed in the joint space. Stemmed spacers had some portion in the humeral canal. Operative time, complications, reimplantation, reinfection, and range of motion were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 37 spacers placed: 22 were stemless and 15 were stemmed. The stemless spacer population was older (70.9 ± 7.8 years vs. 62.8 ± 8.4 years, p = 0.006). The groups had a similar percentage of each gender (stemless group, 45% male vs. stemmed group, 40% male; p = 0.742), body mass index (stemless group, 29.1 ± 6.4 kg/m² vs. stemmed group, 31.5 ± 8.3 kg/m²; p = 0.354) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (stemless group, 4.2 ± 1.2 vs. stemmed group, 4.2 ± 1.7; p = 0.958). Operative time was similar (stemless group, 127.5 ± 37.1 minutes vs. stemmed group, 130.5 ± 39.4 minutes). Two stemless group patients had self-resolving radial nerve palsies. Within the stemless group, 15 of 22 (68.2%) underwent reimplantation with 14 of 15 having forward elevation of 109°± 23°. Within the stemmed group, 12 of 15 (80.0%, p = 0.427) underwent reimplantation with 8 of 12 having forward elevation of 94°± 43° (range, 30° to 150°; p = 0.300). Two stemmed group patients had axillary nerve palsies, one of which self-resolved but the other did not. One patient sustained dislocation of reverse shoulder arthroplasty after reimplantation. One stemless group patient required an open reduction and glenosphere exchange of dislocated reverse shoulder arthroplasty at 6 weeks after reimplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Stemmed and stemless spacers had similar clinical outcomes. When analyzing all antibiotic spacers, over 70% were converted to revision arthroplasties. The results of this study do not suggest superiority of either stemmed or stemless antibiotic spacers.
