Clinical analysis of open surgical drainage approach in treating severe acute pancreatitis with walled-off pancreatic necrosis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-1935.2019.04.004
- VernacularTitle:剖腹引流术治疗重症急性胰腺炎包裹性坏死病灶的临床分析
- Author:
Cheng GENG
1
;
Donghui RAN
;
Ziyan LOU
;
Lu DU
;
Dong YAN
;
Xiyan WANG
;
Xinjian XU
Author Information
1. 新疆医科大学第一附属医院胰腺外科
- Keywords:
Pancreatitis,acute necrotizing;
Walled-off pancreatic necrosis;
Infection;
Drainage;
Debridement
- From:
Chinese Journal of Pancreatology
2019;19(4):256-260
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effect of open surgical drainage approach for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis ( WOPN) in severe acute pancreatitis. Methods Clinical data of 154 WOPN patients admitted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2005 to October 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Traditional open debridement necrosectomy was performed in 83 patients from January 2005 to October 2012 ( debridement group) , and small abdominal incision with low-position open surgical drainage was performed in 71 patients from October 2012 to October 2016 ( drainage group ) . The clinical outcomes of two groups were analyzed and compared. Results 43 cases (51. 8％) in debridement group had postoperative intraperitoneal reinfection, while there were only 13 cases with postoperative intraperitoneal reinfection (18. 3％) in drainage group;18 cases (21. 7％) in debridement group had surgery-related digestive tract fistula, while there were only 4 cases with surgery-related digestive tract fistula (5. 6％) in drainage group; the differences were statistically significant (χ2 = 18. 55, P=0. 001; χ2 = 11. 35, P=0. 002). 15 patients (18. 1％) in debridement group and only 2 patients (2. 8％) in drainage group died. The mortality in drainage group were obviously lower than that in debridement group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 9. 07, P<0. 05 ). 62 cases ( 74. 7％) in debridement group and 55 cases (77. 5％) in drainage group were cured directly, respectively. No significant difference was found between two groups. However, 3 cases (3. 6％) in debridement group and 12 cases (16. 9％) in drainage group were cured by the way of small intestinal fistula in the late stage of intubation, and the latter was higher than the former with statistically significant(χ2 =5. 989,P=0. 014). Conclusions Compared with open debridement necrosectomy, the abdominal infection rate, digestive tract fistula rate and mortality of open surgical drainage were all significantly reduced , which may be a better treatment for WOPN.
