Analysis of factors related to slow-flow or no-reflow in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary sydrome after percutaneous coronary intervention
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2019.06.004
- VernacularTitle:非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后慢血流或无复流相关因素分析
- Author:
Sihua DING
1
;
Lixue MA
;
Xueyu SUN
Author Information
1. 青岛市第八人民医院心内科 266100
- Keywords:
Coronary disease;
Percutaneous coronary intervention;
Slow-flow;
No-reflow
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2019;42(6):497-502
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the factors related to slow-flow (SF) or no-reflow (NR) during the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary sydrome (NSTEACS). Methods Patients diagnosed as NSTEACS who received PCI from September 2007 to June 2018 were collected through the data base of medical record management system in Qingdao Eighth People′s Hospital.The blood flow≤TIMI 2 grade during PCI was defined as slow-flow (SF) or no-reflow(NR). Patients with SF or NR were included into the case group and patients without SF or NR were included into the controlled group. Factors of age, gender, history of hypertension, history of type 2 diabetes, history of high cholesterol, history of smoking, history of drinking, NSTEACS risk stratification, the application of platelet glycoprotein (GP) ⅡB/ⅢA receptor antagonist, coronary artery SYNTAX score, culprit blood vessels, times of balloon dilatation, the burden of thrombus and the preoperative TIMI grade of blood flow were analyzed by multivariate Logistic regression. Then, variables screening was performed through backward method and likelihood ratio test. Results A total of 3 927 patients with NSTEACS receiving PCI were enrolled. After patients with incomplete information were eliminated, 143 patients were admitted to the case group and 3 588 patients were admitted to the control group. After the analysis of multivariate Logistic regression and variables screening, it was showed that times of balloon dilatation ≥ 3 ( OR＝1.725, 95% CI 1.211－2.358, P＝0.014) and high burden of thrombus ( OR＝1.821, 95% CI 1.322-2.511, P＜0.01) were the risk factors of SF or NR, while the application of GPⅡB/ⅢA receptor antagonist ( OR＝0.623, 95% CI 0.382-0.855, P＝0.012) was the protective factor of SF or NR. Conclusions Multiple balloon dilatation and high burden of thrombus increased the risk of SF or NR, while the application of GPⅡB/ⅢA receptor antagonists could inhibit the occurrence of SF or NR.
