Fractal and Complexity Measures of Heart Rate Dynamics in Patients with Normal and Left Ventricular Dysfunction: The Role of New Noninvasive Markers for Cardiac Risk Stratification.
10.4070/kcj.2006.36.8.583
- Author:
Dong Gu SHIN
1
;
Cheul Sung RYU
;
Kyung Tae PARK
;
Sang Hoon YI
;
Geu Ru HONG
;
Jong Sun PARK
;
Young Jo KIM
;
Bong Sup SHIM
;
Ung KIM
;
Sang Hee LEE
Author Information
1. Cardiovascular Division, Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Yeungnam Univesity, Daegu, Korea. dgshin@med.yu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Heart rate;
Left ventricular dysfunction;
Nonlinear dynamics;
Risk assessment
- MeSH:
Cardiovascular Diseases;
Fractals*;
Heart Rate*;
Heart*;
Humans;
Nonlinear Dynamics;
Risk Assessment;
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left*
- From:Korean Circulation Journal
2006;36(8):583-592
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The traditional indexes of heart rate (HR) variability may lack the ability to detect subtle, but important changes in HR behavior. Nonlinear heart rate variability (HRV) analysis methods that are based on chaos theory can reveal subtle abnormalities in the HR dynamics of patients with cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, we tested the validity of nonlinear analysis methods as markers to differentiate normal and abnormal HR dynamics in the cardiovascular disease state. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One-hundred patients were studied: 70 patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD), including 40 post-myocardial infarct patients (PMI) and 30 dilated cardiomyopahty patients (DCM), and 30 age and gender-matched controls. One-hour, 6-hours (day and night each) and 24 hours of R-R interval data from 24-hour Holter recordings were subjected to the conventional time and frequency-domain analysis. The ApEn, short-term (alpha1) and long-term (alpha2) scaling exponents of the detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) and the power-law exponent (beta) were also measured. RESULTS: Conventional linear measures did not show a significant difference except for the VLF, lnLF and the LF/HF ratio between the controls and the LVD patients. Among the analyzed parameters, beta, beta2 and alpha1 were the most powerful discriminators. The beta of the normal and LVD patients was -1.10+/-0.29 and -0.70+/-0.40, respectively (p<0.001), and the alpha1 was 1.08+/-0.23 and 0.81+/-0.28, respectively (p<0.001). The beta, beta2 and alpha1 can discriminate the etiologic cause of LVD. The length of the R-R interval data did not affect the result, and a significant correlation was observed. The individual values of the fractal and complexity measures were more stable than those of the conventional linear measures. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the measures derived from fractal and complexity methods are useful for detecting altered HR dynamics of LVD and for improving the shortcomings of the conventional measures.