Efficacy and safety of endostar intracavitary infusion in treatment of malignant serous cavity effusion: A case control study
10.7507/1007-4848.201701015
- VernacularTitle:恩度腔内灌注治疗恶性浆膜腔积液的疗效及安全性的病例对照研究
- Author:
ZHANG Shuling
1
;
MA Jietao
1
;
ZHAO Jianzhu
1
;
SUN Li
1
;
JING Wei
1
;
ZHOU Yang
1
;
HUANG Letian
1
;
HAN Chengbo
1
Author Information
1. First Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, 110022, P.R.China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Endostar;
carboplatin;
malignant serous cavity effusion;
intracavitary infusion
- From:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2018;25(2):138-142
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of endostar or carboplatin combined with endostar intracavitary perfusion in the treatment of malignant serous cavity effusion. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 78 cancer patients with malignant serous cavity effusion who received paracentesis and intracavitary endostar, or carboplatin combined with endostar in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University between November 2011 and November 2016. There were 42 males and 36 females at a median age of 62 years ranging from 17 to 78 years. According to treatment methods, 78 patients were divided into two groups, in which 33 patients received intracavitary endostar combined with carboplatin (a combination group, 15 males and 18 females at a median age of 56 years ranging from 17 to 66 years), and 45 patients received intracavitary endostar (an endostar group, 27 males and 18 females at a median age of 63 years ranging from 38 to 78 years). The efficacy and safety of two methods were analyzed and compared. Results The response rate in the combination group was 75.8%, which was higher than that in the endostar group (60.0%, P=0.035). In quality of life improvement, there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.113). The incidence of fatigue, myelosuppression and gastrointestinal reactions in the endostar group was significantly lower than that of the combination group (P=0.006, 0.000 and 0.017, respectively). Analysis of long-term efficacy revealed that the median time to progress (TTP) in the combination group and endostar group was 171 days and 143 days, respectively (P=0.030). Conclusion Intracavitary infusion of endostar alone, or carboplatin combined with endostar is effective and tolerable for controlling malignant serous cavity effusion. But for the patients with poor physical state who can not tolerant platinum perfusion, intracavitary infusion of endostar alone can be adopted to control malignant serous cavity effusion.
