Research progress on the management of no packing after septoplasty.
- Author:
Sheng LU
;
Longcheng ZHANG
;
Jieen LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Bandages;
Epistaxis;
Humans;
Nasal Cartilages;
surgery;
Nasal Septum;
abnormalities;
surgery;
Pain, Postoperative;
Postoperative Complications;
Postoperative Period;
Rhinoplasty;
methods;
Surgical Flaps;
Sutures;
Tampons, Surgical;
statistics & numerical data
- From:
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2016;30(1):80-83
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Packing the nose after septoplasty is common practice. The use of postoperative packing has been proposed to reduce the dead space between the subperichondrial flaps and minimize postoperative complications such as hemorrhage, septal hematoma, and formation of synechiae. Additionally, postoperative packing is thought to stabilize the remaining cartilaginous septum and minimize persistence or recurrence of septal deviation. Despite these theoretic advantages, evidence to support the use of postoperative packing is lacking. Additionally, nasal packing is not an innocuous procedure. The use of nasal packing actually cause these complications such as postop- erative pain, mucosal injury, bleeding, worsening of breathing due to sleep disorders, and postoperative infections. Routine use of anterior nasal packing after septoplasty should be challenged for not presenting proven benefit. As alternatives to traditional packing, septal suturing, septal stapler and fibrin glue have been used recently. The purpose of this article is to summarize the progress of traditional packing to no packing after septoplasty.
