Comparative study of front-ethmoid-orbital mass resection via trans scalp coronary incision and functional endoscopic sinus surgery.
- Author:
Wen LI
1
;
Yan WANG
;
Chunshu WU
;
Huimin AN
Author Information
1. Department of Otorhinolaryngolgy-Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China. church.ent.wc@163.com
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Adolescent;
Adult;
Aged;
Cysts;
surgery;
Endoscopy;
Ethmoid Sinus;
surgery;
Female;
Frontal Sinus;
surgery;
Humans;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Orbit;
surgery;
Paranasal Sinus Diseases;
surgery;
Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms;
surgery;
Retrospective Studies;
Scalp;
surgery;
Young Adult
- From:
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2008;22(11):487-488
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the advantages and disadvantages between two surgical approaches of trans scalp coronary incision (TCI) and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) by which front-ethmoid-orbital masses being resected.
METHOD:Thirty-four cases of front-ethmoid-orbital mass from 1995-2006 were retrospectively studied, among which lesions of 18 cases resected by FESS, lesions of 16 cases via TCI. The follow-up time varied from 2 to 4 years.
RESULT:Five of 18 cases by FESS had residual dizziness or nasal pain, one case recurred 2 years after the operation. None of TCI cases experienced recurrence, whereas dizziness presented in 3 cases, regional dull sensation of the operative scalp in 12 cases.
CONCLUSION:FESS and TCI approach has its own benefits and shortcomings thus has its indications respectively.
