Evaluation of a transient noise reduction strategy on the loudness perception and sound quality.
- Author:
Haihong LIU
1
;
Hua ZHANG
;
Xueqing CHEN
;
Yanjun WU
;
Ying KONG
;
Shuo WANG
;
Jing LI
Author Information
1. Beijing Tong Ren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100730, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Adolescent;
Adult;
Aged;
Aged, 80 and over;
Equipment Design;
Female;
Hearing Aids;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural;
rehabilitation;
Humans;
Loudness Perception;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Noise;
Quality Control;
Single-Blind Method;
Young Adult
- From:
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2010;24(19):886-889
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:A current technology for detecting and controlling transient noise in hearing aids (AntiShock) was evaluated. The objective was to evaluate AntiShock on loudness control and whether results in negative changes in sound quality of speech, transient noise and environmental noise and provide implications for hearing aid fitting.
METHOD:Twenty-four subjects with sensorineural hearing loss participated in the study. In a single-blinded paradigm, the subjects were asked to rate loudness of transient noise and distortion of speech, transient noise and environmental noise with the AntiShock in both on and off conditions.
RESULT:(1) The percentage of the transient noise rated as soft, comfortable, loud, too loud was 3.0%, 72.7%, 22.9% and 1.4%, respectively. There were significant differences in mean scores of loudness perception among listening conditions and between genders by a Two-Way ANOVA, the P values were 0.009 and 0.001, respectively. (2) The percentage of the speech rated as mild distorted, understandable, clear and very clear was 2.5%, 30.6%, 32.9% and 34.0%, respectively. There were significant differences in mean scores of speech distortion under different listening conditions by an One-Way ANOVA (P < 0.01). (3) The percentage of the transient noise rated as mild distorted, clear and natural was 2.9% and 97.1%, respectively. No significant differences in mean scores of nature of transient noise was found under different listening conditions by an One-Way ANOVA (P > 0.05). (4) The percentage of the environmental noise rated as mild distorted, clear but soft, clear and natural was 0.4%, 0.8% and 98.8%, respectively. No significant differences in mean scores of nature of environmental noise was found between different listening conditions by an Independent-Samples T Test (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION:AntiShock showed positive effects on the loudness control of the transient noise. Quality of speech, transient noise and environmental noise were not impacted by AntiShock.
