Comparative study of laryngopharyngeal simulation teaching versus and traditional teaching in preclinical training.
- Author:
Weisong LIU
1
;
Ye TIAN
;
Hongwei YU
Author Information
1. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Hainan Nongken Hospital, Haikou, 570311, China. drlws@163.corn
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Educational Technology;
instrumentation;
methods;
General Surgery;
education;
Humans;
Pharynx;
anatomy & histology
- From:
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2012;26(16):767-768
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To explore whether laryngopharyngeal simulator teaching can improve the quality of clinical operation compared with traditional preclinical teaching program.
METHOD:Sixty-five surgical interns were randomly divided into two groups. Experimental group was given traditional clinical practice together with simulator for laryngopharyngeal training, while control group received traditional clinical practice only. The teaching effect were compared through the operation assessment.
RESULT:After simulation training, the performance of experimental group was superior to that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION:Simulator can improve the quality of teaching. It is recommended for teaching hospital and doctor's training base and deserves further promotion.
