Effect of rehabilitation for prelingual deaf children who use cochlear implants in conjunction with hearing aids in the opposite ears.
- Author:
Yanjing TIAN
1
;
Huifang ZHOU
;
Jing ZHANG
;
Dong YANG
;
Yi XU
;
Yuxi GUO
Author Information
1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, the General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300052, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Child;
Child, Preschool;
Cochlear Implantation;
Cochlear Implants;
Deafness;
physiopathology;
rehabilitation;
Female;
Hearing Aids;
Humans;
Male;
Persons With Hearing Impairments;
rehabilitation;
Sound Localization;
Speech Perception;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2012;26(19):868-873
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To compare the effect of rehabilitation of prelingual deaf children who used a cochlear implant (CI) in one ear and a hearing aids in the opposite ear while the hearing level of the opposite ears are different. Hearing ability, language ability and learning ability was included in the content. The aim of this research is to investigate better style of rehabilitation, and to offer the best help to the prelingual deaf children.
METHOD:Accord ing to the hearing level of the ear opposite to the one wearing a cochlear implant and whether the opposite ear wear a hearing aid or not, 30 prelingual deaf children were divided into three groups, including cochlear implant with opposite severe hearing loss and hearing aid ear (CI+SHA), cochlear implant with opposite profound hearing loss and hearing aid ear (CI+PHA), cochlear implant only (CI). The effect of rehabilitation was assessed in six different times (3,6,9,12,15 and 18 months after the cochlear implants and hearing aids began to work).
RESULT:The longer time the rehabilitation spends, the better the hearing ability,language ability and the learning ability were. The hearing ability of CI+SHA was better than those of CI+PHA (P<0.05) and CI (P<0.05). The language ability and learning ability of CI-SHA was nearly equal to those of the other two groups.
CONCLUSION:The prelingual deaf children should take much more time on rehabilitation. The effect of rehabilitation for prelingual deaf children who used cochlear implant in one ear and hearing aid in the other depend on the residual hearing level of the other ear. If a prelingual deaf children still has any residual hearing level in the ear opposite to the cochlear implant ear, it is better for him/her to wear a hearing aid in the ear.
