Clinical characteristics and surgical management of extensive cholesteatoma of external auditory canal.
- Author:
Huibing WANG
1
;
Fei YU
;
Xizheng SHAN
;
Feng ZHANG
;
Shunbo LONG
;
Yun GAO
;
Longzhu ZHAO
;
Dongyi HAN
Author Information
1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Institute of Otorhinolaryngology, PLA General Hospital, Beijing,100853, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Adolescent;
Adult;
Aged;
Child;
Cholesteatoma;
classification;
diagnosis;
surgery;
Ear Canal;
Female;
Humans;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Otologic Surgical Procedures;
Retrospective Studies;
Young Adult
- From:
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2013;27(10):468-472
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To classify the external auditory canal cholesteatoma(EACC) by high-resolution temporal bone CT scans and the clinical findings of the patients, and to discuss the clinical and imaging characteristics and the surgical management of the extensive EACC.
METHOD:A retrospective study was carried out among 56 patients (58 ears) with EACC and their clinical data were carefully analyzed. We classified EACC as the extensive type and the localized type. The operation strategy depended on the extent of lesion. All cases were followed up for 1 to 6 years after surgery.
RESULT:There were 31 patients with localized EACC, 2 with no bone erosion and 29 (31 ears) with bone erosion within external auditory canal, and 25 patients with extensive EACC, 16 with bone erosion of intra temporal bone and 9 with bone erosion of extra temporal bone. Among all the 25 patients with the extensive type, the most common symptoms were otorrhea, otalgia and hearing loss, with 25, 23, 22 cases, respectively. The tympanic membrane (TM) was intact in 23 patients and perforated in two. The mastoid air cells in 23 patients were involved by the lesion, as well as tympanic antrum in eight, tympanic cavity in two, sigmoid sinus bony wall in five, mastoid segment of facial canal in four, and temporomandibular joint in two patients. Twenty patients underwent modified radical mastoidectomy, only one underwent reconstruction of ossicular chain, and four underwent canaloplasty. The average time of ear dry after surgery was 29 days. The postoperative hearing was improved by an average of 15 dB. No recurrence except for one patient was found during the follow-up period.
CONCLUSION:It was of important clinical significance to classify EACC as the extensive type and the localized type. The extensive EACC was misdiagnosed easily because of the complicated clinical manifestations. The classification was helpful for the diagnosis and the selection of surgery strategy of EACC.
