Radiosensitization of sodium glycididazole in esophageal cancer evaluated by 18F-FMISO PET/CT
10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-2848.2019.04.006
- VernacularTitle:18F-FMISO PET/CT显像评估甘氨双唑钠对食管癌的放疗增敏作用
- Author:
Dengyun CHEN
1
;
Huiqin XU
;
Hui WANG
;
Dan ZHANG
;
Wenjing YU
;
Xiaoyu SU
;
Feng QIAO
Author Information
1. 安徽医科大学第一附属医院核医学科
- Keywords:
Esophageal neoplasms;
Radiotherapy;
Radiation-sensitizing agents;
Nitroimidazoles;
Positron-emission tomography;
Tomography,X-ray computed;
Misonidazole
- From:
Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
2019;39(4):218-221
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the feasibility of sodium glycididazole(CMNa)on the radio-sensitization of esophageal cancer(EC)by 18F-fluoromisonidazole(FMISO)PET/CT.Methods A total of 60 patients with EC from December 2016 to December 2017 were enrolled prospectively and were divided into control group(n = 30;21 males,9 females;age:(56.6±10.0)years)and experimental group(n=30;20 males,10 females;age:(59.3±9.0)years)using completely randomized grouping design.Patients in the control group received radiotherapy alone,and those in the experimental group were treated with conventional radiotherapy and CMNa.All patients underwent 18F-FMISO PET/CT imaging 1 week before and after radiotherapy.The imaging results were visually and semi-quantitatively analyzed.The maximum standardized uptake value(SUVmax),tumor/muscle ratio(T/M),and hypoxia volume(HV)were calculated.Paired t test,two-sample t test and/x2 test were used to analyze the data.Results T/M and HV in the control group before and after radiotherapy were 3.92±0.57 vs 1.66±0.35,(1.84±0.31)vs(1.04±0.15)mm3,respectively;T/M and HV in the experimental group before and after radiotherapy were 4.01±0.68 vs 1.27±0.11,(2.01±0.22)vs(0.90±0.09)mm3,respectively.The primary tumor T/M,HV after radiotherapy in 2 groups were significantly lower than those before radiotherapy(t values:12.15-24.43,all P<0.05)and the amplitudes of T/M and HV in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group(?T/M:2.77±0.60vs 2.25±0.49,?HV:(1.12±0.18)vs(0.81±0.26)mm3;t values:3.00 and 1.80,both P<0.05).Meanwhile,the local control rate of EC after 3 months in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group(80.0%(24/30)vs 53.3%(16/30);x2=4.80,P<0.05).Conclusion CMNa has the radiosensitizing effect on EC and the 18F-FMISO PET/CT can evaluate the radiosensitization effect.
