The effects of different types of bone cement intervertebral leakage on stress distribution in endplates of adjacent vertebrae: A finite element study
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2019.06.006
- VernacularTitle:椎间隙骨水泥渗漏的不同分型对邻椎相邻终板应力分布的影响:三维有限元研究
- Author:
Kaiwen CAI
1
;
Guoqiang JIANG
;
Bin LU
;
Kefeng LUO
Author Information
1. 宁波大学医学院附属医院 315020
- Keywords:
Cementoplasty;
Spinal fractures;
Biomechanics
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2019;39(6):364-373
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective Finite element method was used to clarify the biomechanics effect of cement intervertebral leakage during vertebral augmentation.Present a novel classification of bone cement intervertebral leakage.Analyze the effect of stress changing of bone cement intervertebral leakage on adjacent endplate by finite element method.Methods Based on Churojana's classification method,we redefined diverse kinds of intervertebral leakage:as the Type Ⅰ (intervertebral-extradiscal leakage),Type Ⅱ (intradiscal leakage) and Type Ⅲ (combined leakage).Type Ⅱ was also been divided into Ⅱa (anterior),Ⅱb (central),Ⅱc(posterior),Ⅱd (lateral) and Ⅱe (cross-region) due to the location of the leaked bone cement.All the Type Ⅱ cases were divided into 1 or 2 two subtypes according to whether the cement had reached the adjacent vertebral endplate.We established 3D reconstruction of volunteer thoracolumbar spine using Mimics 17.0 software,and using Geomagic 2015 to generate L1 vertebral compression fracture model.In the Ansys 17.0 software,we simulated the L1 bone cement leakage into the T12/L1 intervertebral space model.After validating the validity of the model,calculate the solution of the intact model,non-leakage model and various leakage models,the stress distribution of the caudal endplate of T12 was analyzed in neutral,flexion,extension,lateral bending and torsion.Results The maximum stress of inferior endplate of T12 vertebra of intact model is 11.476 MPa,19.517 MPa,16.879 MPa,42.346 MPa,43.033 MPa,6.568 MPa,6.568 MPa in neutral,flexion,extension,left bending,right bending,left rotation,right rotation respectively.For the non-leakage model,the maximal stress of adjacent vertebral endplate was 12.967 MPa (112.99％),23.134 MPa (118.53％) and 20.403 MPa (120.88％) in neutral,flexion and extension compared to the intact model.No significant increasing can be found in other conditions.Compared to the non-leakage model,the stress of adjacent vertebral endplate is similar when type Ⅰ leakage occurs.In type Ⅱ leakage,the Ⅱa1 was 28.506 MPa (123.40％) in the flexion;the Ⅱa2 was 84.791 MPa (366.52％) in the flexion;the Ⅱb2 was 14.138 MPa (122.82％) in the neutral and 27.313 MPa (118.06％) in the flexion;the Ⅱc1 was 19.695 MPa (128.50％) in the extension;the Ⅱc2 was 67.740 MPa (441.97％) in the extension,and the Ⅱd2(right) was 123.940 MPa (285.83％) in the right bending.In the left/right rotation motions,the stress values are small,ranging from 5.095-15.585 MPa.Conclusion After vertebral augmentation,the stress of adjacent vertebral endplate increased slightly.Type Ⅰ leakage did not further increase the stress of adjacent vertebral endplates.Type Ⅱ leakage increases the stress of adjacent endplates in the direction of leaked cement.Subtype 2 of Type Ⅱ offer more stress than subtype 1.When the peripheral type of leakage (Ⅱa,Ⅱc and Ⅱd) occurred,if the spine flexes in the direction of leakage,then the stress increase of adjacent endplates will increase further.
