The value of left atrial structural and functional parameters combined with cardiac biomarkers in predicting left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in patients with non‐valvular atrial fibrillation
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004‐4477.2019.03.008
- VernacularTitle:左心房结构功能参数联合心脏生物学标记物预测非瓣膜性心房颤动患者左心房自发显影的价值
- Author:
Ying TAN
1
;
Ji WU
;
Decai ZENG
;
Ting ZHANG
;
Guoqiang ZHONG
;
Hongyuan XU
;
Yisheng ZHENG
Author Information
1. 广西医科大学第一附属医院超声科
- Keywords:
Echocardiography,transesophageal;
Atrial fibrillation;
Atrial function,left;
Spontaneous echo contrast;
Cardiac biomarker
- From:
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
2019;28(3):230-234
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the relationships between the structure ,function of left atrial as well as cardiac biomarkers and left atrial spontaneous echo contrast ( SEC ) in patients with non‐valvular atrial fibrillation ( NVAF ) ,and evaluate its predictive value for left atrial SEC . Methods T hirty‐four control subjects and 80 patients with NVAF were included ,patients with NVAF were divided into positive group ( 30 cases) and negative group ( 50 cases) according to w hether SEC was presented on transesophageal echocardiography ( T EE ) . Clinical and laboratory data were collected ,including medical history ,cardiac troponin I ( cT nI) ,and pro‐brain natriuretic peptide ( pro‐BNP ) ,etc . T hen CHA2 DS2‐VASc scores were calculated .The left atrial appendage width ( W LAA ) ,left atrial appendage depth ( DLAA ) ,left atrial appendage blood flow velocity ( V LAA ) ,left atrial volume index ( LAVI) and other parameters were measured by T EE and transthoracic echocardiography ( T T E) ,and left atrial ejection fraction ( LAEF ) was calculated . T he clinical and T EE parameters were compared between the positive and negative group ,T T E parameters and cardiac biomarkers levels were compared among the three groups ,and ROC curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency . Results ①Compared with those in control group ,the value of LAVI and pro‐BNP were significantly increased and LAEF was significantly decreased in negative group ( all P ＜ 0 .01 ) . ②Compared with those in negative group ,CHA 2 DS2‐VASc scores ,WLAA ,DLAA ,LAVI and pro‐BNP levels in positive group showed a significant increase ( all P ＜0 .01) ,LAEF and VLAA showed a significant reduction ( all P ＜0 .01) . ③cT nI between negative group and control group did not show statisticant difference ( P＞0 .05) ,but presented a significant increase in positive group compared with those in control group and negative group (all P ＜0 .01).T he AUC ,sensitivity and specificity of CHA 2 DS2‐VASc scores for SEC were 0 .71 (95% CI :0 .60 ～ 0 .82 ) ,73 .3% and 62 .0%,respectively .When left atrial structural and functional parameters (LAVI and LAEF ) combined with cardiac biomarkers (cT nI and pro‐BNP ) ,the AUC , sensitivity and specificity for SEC were 0 .90 (95% CI :0 .84 ～ 0 .97 ) ,74 .0% and 100%,respectively ,both enhanced w hen compared with CHA 2 DS2‐VASc scores alone ( P ＜ 0 .01 ).Conclusions Left atrial enlargement ,decreased function and elevated levels of cardiac biomarkers are associated with left atrial SEC in patients with NVAF .CHA2 DS2‐VASc scores can be used for perdicting left atrial SEC ,left atrial structural and functional parameters (LAVI and LAEF) combined with cardiac biomarkers (cT nI and pro‐BNP) provide significant increments in prediction of left atrial SEC .
