The predictive value of E/e′for recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation in persistant atrial fibrillation patients by dual gate Doppler
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004‐4477.2019.03.007
- VernacularTitle:双多普勒同步取样技术测量E/e′对持续性心房颤动患者经导管射频消融术后复发的预测价值
- Author:
Yanxiang ZHOU
1
;
Jinling CHEN
;
Sheng CAO
;
Qing ZHOU
;
Ruiqiang GUO
Author Information
1. 武汉大学人民医院超声影像科430060
- Keywords:
Echocardiography;
Atrial fibrillation;
Ventricular function,left;
Dual gate Doppler
- From:
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
2019;28(3):224-229
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To discuss the value of E/e′index measured by dual gate Dopper predicting recurrence after radio frequency catheter ablation ( RFCA ) in persistant atrial fibrillation ( PeAF) patients . Methods Fifty‐three patients with PeAF w ho had successful RFCA and 25 controls were prospectively enrolled . T he patients with PeAF were divided into AF recurrence group ( n ＝21) and AF non‐recurrence group ( n ＝32) with median follow‐up time of ( 25 .94 ± 2 .78) months . All patients with PeAF underwent echocardiography in the preoperative 7 days . With dual gate Doppler ,transmitral flow peak velocity ( E) and mitral annular septal or lateral peak velocity e′( S ) , and e′( L ) in early diastolic were measured simultaneously in the same cardiac cycle ,then E/e′( S ) and E/e′( L ) were automatically calculated .With traditional method ,E ,e′( S) and e′( L ) were measured in different cardiac cycles ,then E/e′( S) and E/e′( L ) were manually calculated .T he time of w hole analysis process with each method was recorded . Results PeAF patients had bigger E/e′( S ) and E/e′( L ) with both dual gate Doppler and traditional method than controls . Compared with those in controls and AF non‐recurrence group ,E/e′( S) and E/e′( L ) increased in AF recurrence group with both dual gate Doppler and traditional method ( all P ＜ 0 .05 ) . No statistical difference was found between the data acquired by dual gate Doppler and traditional method ( all P ＞0 .05) . Cut‐off values of 10 .90 ( sensitivity of 71 .4% ,specificity of 87 .5% ) for E/e′( S) was obtained by dual gate Doppler and 10 .70 ( sensitivity of 81 .0% ,specificity of 62 .5% ) was obtained by traditional method for predicted AF recurrence . Areas under curves between the two methods in ROC analysis was not significant ( 0 .819 vs 0 .728 , P ＞0 .05) . T he w hole analysis time of dual gate Doppler was less than that of traditional method . Between inter‐and intraobservers ,the interclass correlation coefficient with dual gate Doppler was higher and 95% confidence interval range was smaller . Conclusions E/e′( S ) is a valuable predictor for PeAF recurrence after RFCA in patients with PeAF . Dual gate Doppler can noninvasively assess single‐beat E/e′with less analysis time and better reproducibility compared with traditional method .
