Arthroscopic minimally invasive Kirschner wire tension band internal fixation combined with lower limb feedback training in the treatment of patellar fractures
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6315.2019.03.009
- VernacularTitle:关节镜下微创克氏针张力带内固定联合下肢反馈训练治疗髌骨骨折的效果观察
- Author:
Kaiquan LIU
1
;
Liyun WANG
;
Xuefeng LIU
;
Jian JIAO
;
Zhibin GUO
Author Information
1. 河北省开滦总医院林西医院骨科 063103
- Keywords:
Patellar fractures;
Arthroscopy;
Kirschner wire;
Feedback Training;
Rehabilitation
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2019;35(3):231-236
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of arthroscopy minimally invasive Kirschner wire tension band internal fixation combined with lower limb feedback training for patellar fracture.Methods Fifty-eight cases of patellar fracture who received arthroscopy minimally invasive Kirschner tension band internal fixation from March 2016 to April 2018 in Linxi Hospital,Kailuan General Hospital were included in this study.All cases were divided into control group (32 cases) and observation group (26 cases) according to the different rehabilitation methods.Control group received routine rehabilitation,observation group received intelligent feedback system of the lower limbs based on the control group.The recovery of joint function was compared between two groups.Results The clinical efficacy of the observation group was excellent (18 cases),good (6 Cases),and medium (2 cases),the excellent and good rate was 92.30％ (24/ 26).In the control group,the clinical effect was excellent (19 cases),good (9 cases),and medium (4 cases).The excellent and good rate was 87.50％ (28/32).There was no significant difference in clinical efficacy (z =0.80,P＞ 0.05) and excellent and good rate (x2 =0.36,P＞ 0.05) between two groups after 6 months follow-ups.The scores and total scores of B(o)stman patellar fracture function before treatment in observation group were pain (3.3 ± 0.8),Knee range of motion (3.2 ± 0.7),work (1.8 ± 0.3),muscular atrophy (1.8±0.2),auxiliaries (2.9 ± 0.6),effusion (1.2 ± 0.4),giving way (0.3 ± 0.2),climb stairs (0.3 ±0.2) andtotal score (15.0 ±2.2) respectively.The scores and total scores of B(o)stman patellar fracture function after treatment in observation group were pain (5.7 ± 0.4),Knee range of motion (5.8 ± 0.2),work (3.6 ±0.5),muscular atrophy (3.5 ± 0.6),auxiliaries (3.7 ± 0.4),effusion (1.8 ± 0.3),giving way (1.7 ±0.4),climb stairs (1.7 ± 0.5) and total score (28.3 ± 1.6) respectively.The B(o)stman patellar fracture functional score in observation group increased significantly (t =14.62,19.15,16.47,14.78,6.96,7.18,17.26,14.16,26.30,P ＜ 0.05).The scores and total scores of B(o)stman patellar fracture function before treatment in control group werepain (3.4 ± 0.6),Knee range of motion (3.1 ± 0.6),work (1.9 ± 0.4),muscular atrophy(1.7 ±0.3),auxiliaries (2.8 ±0.5),effusion(1.1 ±0.3),giving way(0.4±0.2),climb stairs (0.4 ±0.2) andtotal score (14.8 ±2.3),respectively.The scores and total scores of B(o)stman patellar fracture function after treatment in control group were pain(5.2±0.6),Knee range of motion(4.9 ±0.7),work(3.1 ±0.6),muscular atrophy (2.5 ± 0.5),auxiliaries (3.2 ± 0.4),effusion (1.3 ± 0.4),giving way (1.3±0.3),climb stairs (1.2 ± 0.4) and total score (22.7 ± 2.5),respectively.The functional scores of B(o)stman patellar fracture in control group were significantly increased (t =13.26,12.44,10.16,8.17,3.38,3.22,15.14,11.31,14.13,all P ＜ 0.05).The scores and total scores of B(o)stman patellar fracture in observation group after treatment were significantly higher than those in control group (t =3.64,6.34,3.39,6.93,4.73,5.28,4.35,4.23,9.89,P ＜ 0.05).In observation group,the range of knee joint activity at different time were before operation (30.2 ± 6.1) °,2 weeks after operation (85.6 ± 6.8) °,4 weeks after operation (100.6± 7.5) °,6 weeks after operation (118.5 ± 8.3) °,8 weeks after operation (138.9 ± 8.2) °,respectively.In control group,the range of knee joint activity at different time werebefore operation (29.3 ±7.2) °,2 weeks after operation (74.8 ± 6.9) °,4 weeks after operation (92.8 ± 7.8) °,6 weeks after operation(102.8 ± 9.4) °,8 weeks after operation (121.1 ± 7.3) °,respectively.The range of knee joint activity of two groups were significantly increased with the duration of treatment,Fgroup =124.58,P ＜0.05.The increases of range of knee joint activity in observation group was significantly higher than that in control group,Fintersecrion =11.78,P＜0.05.The overall levels of range of knee joint activity in observation group were significantly higher than that of control group,and Fbetween =36.27,P＜ 0.05.The KSS scores of in observation group werebefore operation (40.5 ± 8.8),2 weeks after operation (66.4 ± 9.0),4 weeks after operation(76.8±9.1),6 weeks after operation (83.4 ±9.5) and 8 weeks after operation (89.4 ± 8.1),respectively.The KSS scores in control group at different time were before operation(38.9 ±9.2),2 weeks after operation (60.1 ± 8.3),4 weeks after operation (70.4± 8.2),6 weeks after operation (77.6± 7.3) and 8 weeks after operation(82.5±8.6) respectively.The KSS score of two groups were significantly increased with the duration of treatment,Fgroup =84.32,P＜0.05.The increases of KSS score in observation group were significantly higher than that in control group,Fintersecrion =8.94,P＜0.05.The overall levels of range of KSS score in observation group were significantly higher than that of control group,and Fbetween =28.52,P ＜0.05.Conclusion The application of lower limb feedback training system after arthroscopic minimally invasive Kirschner wire tension band fixation can promote the recovery of knee joint function in patients with patellar fracture.
