Comparison of efficacy and safety of three different surgical methods for nasal vestibular cyst
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2019.08.005
- VernacularTitle:三种不同术式治疗鼻前庭囊肿的疗效及安全性比较
- Author:
Wenchao WANG
1
;
Xiang WANG
;
Xiaowei SHEN
;
Wenbing LI
Author Information
1. 太原市中心医院耳鼻喉科 030009
- Keywords:
Cysts;
Vestibular diseases;
Nose;
Catheter ablation;
Natural orifice endoscopic Surgery;
Surgical procedures,operative;
Postoperative complications;
Comparative effectiveness research
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2019;26(8):915-918
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of endoscopic nasal vestibule cysts,lip gingival trench path nasal vestibule excision and low temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation under nasal endoscope in the treatment of nasal vestibule cyst.Methods From January 2013 to December 2017,ninety patients with nasal vestibule cyst admitted in Taiyuan Central Hospital were selected. According to different surgical methods,the patients were divided into nasal endoscope nasal vestibule cyst group( A group,26 cases),cleft lip gingival vestibule cyst excision group(B group,36 cases),low temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation group under nasal endoscopy( C group, 28 cases). The efficacy and safety of the three types of operation were compared. Results The operation time [(15.5 ± 3.6) min] and wound healing time [( 2. 3 ± 0. 9 ) d] in A group and the operation time [( 16. 3 ± 4.5)min],wound healing time[(2.1 ± 0.5)d] in C group were all significantly shorter than those in B group,the differences were statistically significant(t=5.268,4.698,5.624,4.267,all P<0.05).The amount of bleeding in C group[(9.3 ± 0.6)mL] was the least,followed by A group[(12.2 ± 1.7)mL],and the difference among the three groups was statistically significant(t=8.256,7.254,all P<0.05).The postoperative wound VAS score among the three groups was statistically significant(F=12.674,P<0.001),and the VAS score in C group[(1.6 ± 0.7)points]
