A study on the prognosis of different surgical procedures for severe jejunoileal atresia
10.3760/cma.j.issn.2096-2932.2019.03.003
- VernacularTitle:不同手术方式治疗难治型先天性小肠闭锁的预后分析
- Author:
Junjian LYU
1
;
Yanfen PENG
;
Hong ZHANG
;
Haiqing ZHENG
;
Qiuming HE
;
Zhe WANG
;
Wei ZHONG
;
Jiakang YU
Author Information
1. 广州市妇女儿童医疗中心新生儿外科监护室 510623
- Keywords:
Intestinal atresia;
Enterostomy;
Surgical procedure;
Prognostic analysis
- From:Chinese Journal of Neonatology
2019;34(3):172-176
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the prognosis of different surgical procedures and to find the relatively safe and effective treatment for severe jejunoileal atresia(sJA).Method From January 2007 to June 2018,children with sJA receiving different surgical procedures in our hospital were retrospectively reviewed.Their clinical data were analyzed,including the survival rate,complication rate,unplanned re-operation rate and postoperative nutritional status.Result A total of 130 patients were enrolled in this study.According to the different types of surgical procedures,the patients were assigned into primary anastomosis group (58 cases,44.6％),Mikulicz double barrel ileostomy group (17 cases,13.1％) and Bishop-Koop anastomosis group (55 cases,42.3％).The overall mortality rate was 6.2％ (8/130).No significant differences existed in mortality rates among the three groups (P＞0.05).The incidences of gastrointestinal complications in primary anastomosis group (70.6％,12/17) and Mikulicz group (70.6％,12/17) were both higher Bishop-Koop group (34.5％,19/55),the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).The unplanned re-operation rates were 34.5％ (20/58) in the primary anastomosis group and 17.6％ (3/17) in the Mikulicz group,both higher than the Bishop-Koop group (3.6％,2/55),the differences were also statistically significant (P＜0.05).Multivariate analysis showed that the risk of complications in the primary anastomosis group (OR=3.434,95％CI 1.392～8.471) and Mikulicz group (OR=5.933,95％CI 1.467～23.991) were higher than the Bishop-Koop group.The risk of unplanned re-operation in the primary anastomosis group was 12.422 times as the Bishop-Koop group (95％CI 2.535～60.877).No significant differences existed between the Mikulicz group and the Bishop-Koop group in the risk of unplanned re-operation (P＞0.05).The weight for age (Z-score) in the Bishop-Koop group (-1.4,95％CI-2.0～-0.8) at the stoma closure time was better than the Mikulicz group (-3.2,95％CI-4.4～-2.0),the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.01).Conclusion Bishop-Koop anastomosis has lower complication rate and lower unplanned re-operation rate in the treatment of sJA.The nutritional status of children who received Bishop-Koop anastomosis is better than Mikulicz double barrel ileostomy at the stoma closure time.Bishop-Koop anastomosis is relatively safe and effective for sJA patients.
