Comparison of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Activity in Normal Bone Marrow, in vivo G-CSF Stimulated Bone Marrow, and G-CSF-Mobilized Peripheral Blood.
- Author:
Hyun Sun RHIM
1
;
Jong Wook LEE
;
Chang Gi MIN
;
Hee Sun HONG
;
Woo Sung MIN
;
Chun Choo KIM
Author Information
1. Catholic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Center, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Hematopoietic stem cell;
Immunophenotype;
Clonogeneicity;
Long-term culture-initiating cell (LTC-IC)
- MeSH:
Bone Marrow Transplantation;
Bone Marrow*;
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor*;
Granulocyte-Macrophage Progenitor Cells;
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation;
Hematopoietic Stem Cells*;
Immunophenotyping;
Myeloid Progenitor Cells;
Stem Cell Transplantation;
Stem Cells
- From:Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion
2000;11(2):157-167
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Classically, bone marrow (BM) has been the sole source of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, but limitations of conventional bone marrow transplantation have stimulated a search for alternative sources of stem cells. METHODS: We compared hematopoietic stem cell activity of normal bone marrow (BM), in vivo G-CSF-stimulated bone marrow (G-CSF BM), and G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood (G-CSF PB) by immunophenotyping, clonogeneicity, and long-term culture-initiating cell (LTC-IC) analysis. RESLUTS: The average numbers of CD34+/HLA-DR- cells after CD34+ cells isolation from each stem cell source were 59.64 +/- 8.70%, 91.39 +/- 1.98%, and 95.75 +/- 2.08% in normal BM, G-CSF BM, and G-CSF PB, respectively (normal BM vs. G-CSF BM, normal BM vs. G-CSF PB, p<0.0001). And the average numbers of CD34+/CD38- cells were 66.23 +/- 9.33%, 95.08+/- 2.09%, and 91.76 +/- 4.59% in normal BM, G-CSF BM, and G-CSF PB, respectively (normal BM vs. G-CSF BM, normal BM vs. G-CSF PB, p<0.0001). The numbers of CFU-GM was significantly higher in G-CSF PB (53.2 +/- 4.05) and G-CSF BM (52.5 +/- 3.63) than that of normal BM (31.3+/- 5.50) (p<0.0001). Also the numbers of CFU-GEMM and CFU-Mk were also significantly higher in G-CSF PB (110.3 +/- 8.79 and 13.3 +/- 1.49) and G-CSF BM (109.7 +/- 10.78 and 11.2 +/- 1.69) than that of normal BM (48.8 +/- 1.48 and 8.5 +/- 1.72) (p<0.05). Comparison of LTC-IC in the three sources of stem cells showed that G-CSF PB and G-CSF BM were superior to normal BM at five weeks of culture (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the amount of both early progenitor cells and late progenitor cells in G-CSF PB and G-CSF BM are higher than that of normal BM. And our results further support that the higher stem cell transplantation using G-CSF-mobilized PB and in vivo G-CSF-stimulated BM can lead to more rapid and sustained engraftment even in cases of high risk of rejection.
